User talk:NapoliRoma/Archive 4

Nomination of 4Sight (telephony) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 4Sight (telephony) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/4Sight (telephony) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Block?
I've been unable to edit today, getting the message


 * Editing from 148.87.19.206 has been blocked (disabled) by Kww for the following reason(s):


 * Vandalism

I'm unclear on why this should be happening, as first off, this would appear to be the gateway to the Very Large Corporation I work from, so, kind of a scorched-earth thing, I'd think; and second: I'm logged in.

Can anyone help explain what's going on here?--NapoliRoma (talk) 23:30, May 7, 2014 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree
I fail to see how "acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle Corporation" isn't an adaptation of the article title into a sentence form. It should be bolded. -- Kevin W.  - Talk  03:11, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, Kevin. My apologies; I messed up the link to WP:BOLDTITLE, which covers this, in my edit summary.


 * Generally speaking, only a literal title should be bolded, not a paraphrase of the title. If the title is paraphrased in the lead sentence, as is done here (and appropriately so), it should not be bolded. Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 04:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

National Board of Ophthalmology listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National Board of Ophthalmology. Since you had some involvement with the National Board of Ophthalmology redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  21:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HP Gram Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:HP Gram Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NFG. Non-free logo galleries are generally not considered complaint with WP:NFCC. ViperSnake151   Talk  02:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HP Gram Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:HP Gram Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sun-1 Badge.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sun-1 Badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Gelato Federation
Bonjour, parlant exclusivement le français, je vais m'exprimer en celui-ci ; excusez-moi bien si vous avez du mal à le comprendre.

Je pense que le bandeau d'homonymie est adapté car dans la page Gelato (disambiguation), il y a un lien vers Gelato Federation. À vous de voir. Cordialement, --CRH (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

'falsely'
Just to reassure you that the only reason for my removing 'falsely' from the B Obama 'birther' page, was that I thought conspiracy theories were necessarily false. Your judgement call though. Pincrete (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No prob -- I'm mainly following general consensus over the years by restoring it.
 * But bear in mind that you may be premature in switching to the past tense... "any day now!" -- Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Integrated standby instrument system


The article Integrated standby instrument system has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Not much content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 12:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Integrated standby instrument system


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Integrated standby instrument system requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)