User talk:Nappateemu

Raappana
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Raappana, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.last.fm/music/Raappana. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Raappana, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Raappana appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Raappana has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Raappana and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Raappana with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Raappana.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. – Sadalmelik ☎ 19:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Brazil
First off, don't tell me to do. Second, I looked for a policy regarding worst defeat and found nothing remotely close to what you are saying on the football project page prior to making the edit, that is why I edited it. Second, apparently it should be that way because it was not only added back but I also was thanked for the edit. So before claiming a policy exists, you might want to check that it actually exists.-- Rockchalk 717 01:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, the person that added it back has 2,500 edits, you have 39. Furthermore, you were new to editing them as well. I primarily edit pages for American football which I was also new to at one point.

September 2016
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Calder Memorial Trophy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.   Ravenswing   11:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

WP: HOCKEY's take on diacritics
See here for why we delete/hide diacritics on NHL non-player based articles :) GoodDay (talk) 16:46, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

January 2021
Your recent editing history at Mehmet Oz shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 17:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I see you reverted again, contrary to the warning just above. Bad decision. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 18:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 18:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)