User talk:Narayananm1998

May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Trinavarta, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so I have moved it to Draft:Trinavarta so that you can continue working on it. If you have any questions, please leave a note on this page. Please consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. - MrX 13:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Trinavarta


Hello, Narayananm1998. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Trinavarta".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —CraigyDavi (T∙C∙@) 19:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Bali, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pushyamitra Shunga— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Adding to this, please have a look at WP:V: you need to cite sources when you are adding content to an article. Also, please provide an explanation in form of an edit summary when you remove content from an article. utcursch &#124; talk 06:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Legendary kings of Magadha. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 19:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Puranic chronology. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 18:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Actually it's a bit worse. That section is sourced to a particular source, so you shouldn't edit to make it deviate from the source. Doug Weller  talk 18:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Doug Weller talk 07:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please don't change quotations
I don't know why you made this edit but the source clearly shows it was correct before you made the change. Doug Weller talk 10:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Another mistaken edit
This one. Again, you've changed source text. You simply should not do that unless the text misrepresents the source. You shouldn't change it because you think the source was wrong. At times you can add text with a different source, but you should probably suggest such changes at the article's talk page as at the moment you don't understand our sourcing policy. You need to read WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 10:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Changing text so it no longer represents the source
Are you saying that your changes here are a more faithful representation of what Doniger wrote? Did you read what Doniger wrote? Doug Weller talk 10:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)