User talk:Narbethwriter

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Narbethwriter! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Oliver Narbett for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oliver Narbett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oliver Narbett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mccapra (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Jo Narbett for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jo Narbett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jo Narbett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. TLA (talk) 06:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your commitment to Wikipedia's standards. Regarding the proposed deletion, I would like to reinforce the argument for retaining the article on the business woman.
 * The business woman has a notable history in the hospitality industry, which is relevant for the notability criteria on Wikipedia. Specifically:
 * Management of Award-Winning Pubs: Jo Narbett co-managed The Bell & Cross in Clent, which was named Pub of the Year 2010 by The Good Pub Guide. This achievement is significant as it was chosen from over 5,000 independently-run pubs, reflecting a high level of recognition in the industry​​.
 * Long-term Business Ownership and Success: Jo owned The Chequers at Cutnall Green for over 20 years. This gastro pub gained fame and was well-regarded in the area. The long-term ownership and the successful management of this establishment demonstrate substantial involvement and impact in the business sector​​.​​.
 * These points highlight Jo Narbett's significant role in the hospitality industry, particularly in managing and elevating notable establishments in the UK. This history of professional achievement and impact in a specific sector aligns well with Wikipedia's criteria for notability, which emphasize the importance of significant coverage and impact in one's field. Narbethwriter (talk) 21:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Roger Narbett moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Roger Narbett. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  Just ' i ' yaya  08:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Narbethwriter, I think that you have a conflict of interest with the areas you are working on, please review the conflict of interest policy. COI editors should submit drafts through articles for creation with the blue button on the page.  Just ' i ' yaya  08:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. The Wordsmith Talk to me 03:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Narbethwriter (talk) 09:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Your reason here [Adding here is reply is disabled on appeal comments below]. None of my articles were promotional, paid or boosterism. All were about individuals who's surname had derived  / had a connection to Narberth, who had a notable achievement under the objective belief that they met the guidelines of wikipedia, specifically had won national awards and set records. All articles were created/edited based on facts and referenced with news articles and sources. There were no personal or promotional details added to any article.
 * I would add that a page was deleted ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Narbett ), that I did not create, that had been in existence for a number of years, and related to a professional footballer who met the notability criteria (similar to many other professional footballers). I added minor details about their club's played for and referenced this with a new source. This was in no way promotional, paid for or boosterism, which is clear by the minimal edit made. I added these details as they were an easy contribution for a new editor to make and build out skills on Wikipedia. The deletion of the page in this case, because I made a minor edit within my theme of focus was unnecessary shows that the allegations against my account are unfair.
 * I am happy to move away from this topic and edit articles generally, avoiding a theme if that satisfies the administrators. Though I would add that many people focus on a specific theme when editing Wikipedia. Narbethwriter (talk) 09:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You're right that I missed the article history of Jon Narbett in my cleanup; I've now restored it and sent it to AFD for review. For any admin handling future appeals, please also see Articles for deletion/Oliver Narbett. The two IPs from the same location who wanted to keep it, within minutes of each other, using the same writing style as this editor. There's also the obvious ChatGPT-generated !vote from this editor, which isn't specifically sanctionable yet but still speaks to credibility. The Wordsmith Talk to me 18:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to clarify that, as a new editor, my contributions to Wikipedia have indeed been focused but are driven by a genuine interest in a specific niche. So far, my efforts have been concentrated on drafting articles and making edits related to the Welsh town of Narberth and individuals who have historical, ancestral, or cultural connections to this area. This focus is due to my personal interest, knowledge in this particular subject area and recent news articles that have come to my attention. All pages created and edited have been based on fact, with references to sources online. :Going forward, I plan to continue contributing to Wikipedia by drafting articles and updating existing ones that meet this criteria. My recent efforts in this space are indicative of my commitment to enhancing the content related to this specific area of interest, and I hope these contributions provide some assurance as to my credibility and intentions as a Wikipedia editor. :I hope to continue to contribute constructively to Wikipedia and appreciate the opportunity to clarify my editorial focus and intentions} Narbethwriter (talk) 00:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC) |decline = I fixed your request, as it was broken. That said, you clearly are not capable of editing in a neutral way about the topics you have described, so if you were to be unblocked, you would not be permitted to edit about them, and whether it's boosterism or paid editing, Wikipedia does not permit promotion of anyone or anything. Is there something aside from "Narberth" topics you would want to edit? Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)}}