User talk:Narkova

A virus has been uploaded to this page and your computer will crash.
 * Thanks m8, i appreci8 it. Narkova (talk) 07:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wales
The squad announced on the official Welsh RL site is different to the one on the official RLWC side. includes Matt Barron while includes Anthony Walker. Which side do we go with? Mattlore (talk) 19:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The Welsh RL site says Ant Walker (concussion) was ruled out through injury, so I guess Wales RL just hasn't submitted an updated line up to the RLWC organisers yet. Mattlore (talk) 19:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah I definitely think Wales Rugby League is the more reliable source. Narkova (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Tonga v the Lions
Point taken but we might need to revisit if the RLIF and/or the RFL say it wasn't a test match and doesn't count for Tongan test records. Nthep (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I have no doubt that the RFL will count the match among their records. It depends how the whole Tonga situation finishes as to whether the new board recognises these matches retrospectively. But I'm willing to bet the RLIF will consider them Tests as the Invitational team is within their control, as far as I'm aware. Or perhaps the NRL is in control of the team, but they are of course still aligned with the RLIF. Narkova (talk) 11:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Bonus point tries
Any suggestions on how to indicate 5 point tries in the 9s articles? Nthep (talk) 09:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The Template:Rugbyleaguebox collapsible currently just has fields "points1" and "points2", so you can create the bold headings manually. Something to this effect, but perhaps in a different order or different wording:


 * Narkova (talk) 12:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

That works, I'd perhaps call it Bonus point tries or use a symbol e.g.

* indicates bonus point try worth 5 points

Happy with either though. Nthep (talk) 13:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I don't think the symbol quite works for when a player scores both a bonus try and non-bonus try, like you show for Jake Connor. I also find it a bit redundant to list that each player has one try each, so perhaps that's what makes "(1, 1*)" look rather odd.
 * I think using "5 point tries" is a bit more self explanatory for those unaware that there was indeed a method for scoring tries worth an extra point. But they're all correct whichever wording ends up being used. Narkova (talk) 13:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 5 point or Bonus point - not a lot in it either way. After I'd posted my comment I realised there's a further disadvantage to the symbol as you can't get the explanation inside the collapsed box so let's go with your way. Nthep (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yep, 5 point or Bonus point. Either is better than bonus zone, which requires a search of the rule variations to explain its value. Narkova (talk) 13:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Toronto Wolfpack current squad
Template:Toronto Wolfpack current squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:20, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

IRL eligibility rules
Thanks for creating this article. It's such a minefield and should have had a page on its own sooner. Nthep (talk) 12:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Cheers, I'm glad you think it's a good addition! Narkova (talk) 12:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)