User talk:Narremdie

April 2023
Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I noticed that you recently removed content from 21 at 33 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 07:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * There were two incidents of poor spacing which I just corrected Narremdie (talk) 07:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 08:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, please don't remove references from articles without good reason. They are needed for verifiability. AP 499D25 (talk) 10:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeatedly removing references. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 10:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Demand-side platform, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)