User talk:Narutolovehinata5/Archive 2

Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new maessage below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost, to see my signpost.

=Talk Page=

(Just wanted to say hi)
=) hi

New article
Hello! Here is an idea: create the article in Sandbox, then let me take a look at it to see if it will make the grade or if it will need editing. Most OVA titles pass notability, but it all depends on how the article is written. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, the subject is notable. But you will obviously need to add more information.  I would recommend keeping it off-wiki until you have enough data and references for a solid presentation. You are on the right track, good job! Ecoleetage (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations
Hi Narutolovehinata5, I saw your comment in your stub-sort of Everett Gendler. Don't sweat or worry about it too much, it was a bit of a mess and I agree that the notability wasn't immediately evident. Try to remember that just because an article may be technically eligible for a speedy under A7, that doesn't necessarily mean you should tag it, you should look at whether the article can be expanded or clarified so that it unambiguously meets the notability criteria.

For the same reason, Sex On Fire might be overturned, while you are technically correct, as a radio single by a large notable band like Kings of Leon, its very likely to be created and populated at some point. Your nom of Fajar Secondary School is pretty close to the mark, although or AFD might have been appropriate as well.

Happy editing! Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC).

I would like to get your opinion on something
Kumusta! Since you have very good judgment, so I wanted to know if you could take a couple of minutes to review this AfD discussion:. The opinion on that is evenly split -- I think it is notable, but other people are putting up a good argument to delete it. I would like you to review this and lend your opinion. Your previous AfD calls were on target, which is why I am interested in having you here. I hope all is well. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Random thoughts on new article and on me
Hello! The new article is off to a good start. I might recommend expanding the introduction, perhaps expanding the plot (if possible), adding some details on the characters and maybe offering a brief section on the reviews. You need more references, too. I did a little editing to set up the Reference section. As it stands, it is a little too brief to be published -- give it some more work and then it should be able to go online without fear of CSD erasure.

As for me -- I am very flattered about your offer, but this is not something I am currently looking to pursue. But thank you so much for thinking of me -- I am genuinely honoured. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:VIrginFleetCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:VIrginFleetCover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, when using a piece of promotional artwork to illustrate a film or DVD related article, you should add as part of the upload for the file.  Otherwise, these nasty bots will come along and stress you out. Better fix it ASAP.  Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. I just added the tag for you -- just to speed things along. But remember that tag in the future! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Breuner Airfield
Please note that AfD's are a discussion, not a vote. If you don't give reasons past "notable" then you're contributing nothing to the discussion, and the closing admin will most likely ignore what you say. Ironholds 14:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, Ironholds, but please don't say that our young friend is contributing "nothing" -- that is not an appropriate thing to say. You may wish to say that we would welcome his reasoning on the merits of the article, and to explain why he feels it should not be deleted. Narutolovehinata5 is relatively new to Wikipedia and many of its aspects are still relatively new to him. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)