User talk:Narutolovehinata5/Archives/2021

Help regarding WAM Postcard
Hello, Narutolovehinata5. I am a participant of WAM2020 from both English and Bengali Wikipedia and eligible for getting postcards from both of them. I recieved MediaWikiMessageDelivery Message about the google form and have filled up once (following the link in Bengali Wikipedia). Do I have to fill it again for enwiki? Thanks in advance. Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 03:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Honestly I am not the best person to ask about this given that I was only a judge and not an organizer. It would be best to ask SuperHamster or Sky Harbor as they are the organizers. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I have asked SuperHamster. :) Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 03:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Madoka Kaname
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

About my DYK you commented on
I do not know if you already know this, but I wrote an alternate hook for my DYK on Morning Star (1862 ship). A lot of people have told me that the second hook is a lot more interesting. Thank you for your time. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shiroisuna no Aquatope


The article Shiroisuna no Aquatope has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:TOOSOON, looking for this (under the Japanese name) produces very few results."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

WP 20
Thank you for good wishes! - Happy Wikipedia 20, - proud of a little bit on the Main page today, and 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, look: create a new style - revive - complete! I sang in the revival mentioned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

... and today Jerome Kohl, remembered in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Miki Satō (singer)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Mapuche polygamy
I saw you closed Template:Did you know nominations/Mapuche polygamy. I would like to ask you to open it again. From the biggining I noticed the reviewer had a negative attitude towards me and said explicitely that " I would like to have another author that assume good faith and neutrality address this DYK nomination.". As such it would be fair for the article, and for me, to have another reviewer.In the last reply SnowFire proposed another hook:
 * "that Mapuche polygamy was an area of dispute that complicated Christian missionary attempts to the Mapuche people during the colonial era of Chile?"

which I thought was good, but was not considered. Sietecolores (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have to note that SnowFire did agree with the proposal to close the nomination, which I took into account when closing the nomination. Admittedly I'm unfamiliar with the topic and I didn't take a good look at the article, but Curry's arguments as to the issues with the sourcing and accuracy of the article appear to be convincing. I do have to note that you did not leave a message on the nomination stating that you were fine with SnowFire's hook, but even if it were to be considered, the issues regarding sourcing and accuracy would still need to be addressed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained in the DYK nomination the whole handling of the issue by Curry was bad faith/biased or simply ignorant. Since when do images from a book need to be sourced? Which is the correct place to proceed with this case? Sietecolores (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I am reading through the nomination page again and nowhere was assuming bad faith about the article and in fact they even detailed in great length that they thought you were knowledgeable about the subject, and that their issues mostly lied in the accuracy and availability of sources. If anything, the one who was assuming bad faith here is you, as you were calling them "ignorant" or "having a negative attitude" when in fact they took great lengths to be as neutral as possible. As a DYK editor who has experienced commenting and reading on nominations that stall or even get rejected due to inaccurate wordings or neutrality concerns, it is very important that any hook that deals with potentially controversial ethnic or religious aspects has spot-on accuracy and is strongly backed by sources. The original hook, and potentially even the suggested new one, would be on a one-way ticket to WP:ERRORS if the nomination was approved in its current state. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree with Narutolovehinata, Sietecolores. Like I said in the DYK nomination page, not every article is suitable for DYK.  It's a cool bonus if it's selected, but it going to DYK is not required or mandatory, and a reviewer raising concerns (like CurryTime did) is them doing their job, not showing bad faith.  This is an article on a sensitive and potentially controversial subject - it's not going to go on DYK without really firm backing.  A single PhD thesis is not enough.  SnowFire (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This: "Worse of all, it poses what appears to be the author's personal opinions as objective facts." is a grave accusation that is unacceptable in Wikipedia where we assume good faith.   was toying and spreading the idea I am distorting facts to fit my "personal opinions". I raised this concern from the very beginning, and asked for another reviewer. Sietecolores (talk) 16:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm going to jump in and respond because I keep getting pinged on this. The claims by Sietecolores about my intentions, "bad faith," etc. are, in a way, reflective of the problems with this DYK nomination. Whether by accident or otherwise, a lot of their claims, upon closer investigation, are misleading.
 * 1.) I never said anything of the kind they claimed above, much less "explicitly." What I did say (and is publicly available to anybody curious about this whole exchange) was: "I’d like to add with some relevancy to this discussion that Sietecolores please behave more civilly and refrain from making personal attacks. I do not doubt that they may be knowledgeable, that they mean well, and care passionately about this topic. But their combative behavior is against their own interests as it will make other editors disinclined to want to help or cooperate with them. Again, another fluent Spanish speaker is welcome to review the aforementioned thesis. Maybe they’ll disagree that its methodology is obscure and flawed, that the author’s grasp of grammar leaves something to be desired." Far from "admitting" anything, my remarks were an invitation to seek outside opinions from other editors in order to avoid the bad optics of taking a decision on this nomination alone. In fact, they now have two more editors who agree with my reservations about this DYK.
 * 2.) While they did raise concerns about my judgment initially, they also were satisfied with having me review their DYK: "As written above, I am addressing most of the issues CurryTime7-24 is concerned about But I will accept he/she being the reviewer here." I did not paraphrase them, by the way. This is a verbatim quote I copy+pasted from the archived discussion on this DYK. They can please look it over in case they do not believe me.
 * 3.) SnowFire didn't exactly "propose" a new hook, but rather was illustrating a point to you about DYK hooks needing to be accurate and conforming to WP:NOR standards.
 * 4.) I stand by my statements on the main source of this article: it's simply not well written or researched. Leaving aside its orthographical and grammatical errors, run-on paragraphs, and generally unpolished writing style, what really bothered me was that it often presented claims as facts; yet upon closer examination, one finds that the author's conclusions were more specious than they seem to believe. The issue of polyandry, for example, is the one that sticks out the most in my mind. It seemed to me as if the author's zeal and enthusiasm on this point led them to rely on what were, at best, folk or urban lore as the basis for their "truths." Nowhere in the thesis is any evidence (i.e. verifiable documentation) ever presented to the reader, despite the author's insistence that this phenomenon not only existed historically, but continues to exist. In fact, the thesis itself undermines the author's argument by presenting various quotes from Mapuche people who view polyandry as antithetical to their culture. One person cited in the thesis emphatically rejected the existence of the practice among his people: "No, porque siento que no tengo ningún antecedente al respecto. Difícil que ella tenga un antecedente, no... esa cuestión es antinatural, lo más antinatural del mundo." ("No, because I feel that I don't have any precedents to this respect. It would be difficult for there to be a precedent, no... this matter is against nature, the most against nature in the world.") Whatever "evidence" is presented about this practice is, again, basically hand-me-down folk tales about people long ago. On page 296, the author presents a series of three quotes from Mapuche to whom she directed questions about polyandry among their people. Their replies invariably answered in Chilean dialect that although a family relation had mentioned to them about other people engaging in this practice, that they themselves had no personal knowledge and could not confirm. I'm not arguing against the possibility that such a practice may have occurred. The problem is that there exists no verifiable documentation. No records, no first-hand written accounts, nothing which could reasonably said to constitute the kind of proof needed to solidify claims to the contrary in a Wikipedia article, let alone in a DYK mention. I find it troubling that they've consistently misquoted me and others; these tendencies are also, unfortunately, all too apparent in their manner of sourcing claims in this article. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Modest flowers
Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk, - see also Wikipedia Signpost/2021-03-28/Obituary! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Jesu, meine Freude
Thank you for playing a role for the long way of an article about music significant in my life, Bach's motet Jesu, mein Freude, on its long way from the start in 2006 to the Main page today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK question
Hi. It looks like your DYK suggestion got archived before I got a chance to reply. In general we don't encourage students to nominate their work for DYK (although there are a few classes that do so regularly with quite a bit of success). From time to time there's a class that ends up thinking they are supposed to nominate their work for DYK (in at least one case I remember it being because the instructor misunderstood the DYK process). I try to close quick-fail noms, but I don't always get to them quickly enough. I'm never sure what to do with incomplete untranscluded noms.

Asking students to tag their DYK noms might have the unintended effect of making more students think they should nominate their work for DYK. I plan to revise a lot of our training material for students this summer. I would like to create a way to encourage good work to go to DYK while weeding out all the unsuitable submissions. If I come up with any feasible plans, I will definitely run it past the DYK regulars. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Risa Tsumugi
Hello! Your submission of Risa Tsumugi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2021 (UTC) lullabying (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Risa Tsumugi
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 07:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, but would there be a way to fix it in such a way that it archives every month? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? Do you want monthly archive pages (so /Archives/2021/January, /Archives/2021/February, etc)? Do you want it to move things to the archive every month? Do you want to archive things that are a month old? It's currently set to create yearly archive pages (/Archives/2019, /Archives/2020, /Archives/2021), just as you have now. And it will currently archive anything that hasn't had any replies for 10 days. Creating monthly archive pages, or changing the 10 days to 30 or 31 days is no problem. But it's not possible to have the bot only come by here once a month. --rchard2scout (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I see. I was thinking of monthly archives but keeping everything in just one year subpage. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay. I have changed the setting so that it archives when things are a month old, feel free to revert that if you don't want it. And I've kept it at yearly subpages. --rchard2scout (talk) 10:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Alamode
@ Thanks for reviewing the subject. Best regards RV (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * May i ask you to spare a minute for a review Alamode (disambiguation). Regards RV (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, 🐶EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 03:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Yūka Nishio
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Flightless (Record Label)
Narutolovehinata5, just a courtesy note to let you know I plan to close this nomination within 24 hours. It had already been closed before, but I reopened it because there hadn't been any opportunity to address the issues. That opportunity has been more than given, it's a student editor whose class has ended and hasn't posted in over three weeks, and it's time to close the nomination on a problematic article. Further review would only be a waste of time. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello :

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is currently a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

August Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Magtymguly Pyragy
Hi! I would like to thank you for your time and effort you spent on considering my nomination of Magtymguly page for DYK. I admit I have missed that 7 day eligibility rule currently in place for DYK nominations, but I hope better luck next time. Also, I appreciate your thought of considering asking for an IAR exemption for my case. Thank you once again and take care! -- Visioncurve Timendi causa est nescire  05:10, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Raychell
—valereee (talk) 00:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for articles like this! My 12th today, DYK? I decorated, also for a birthday. Songs invite to more music, places, food and flowers. - From my first day on Wikipedia, I have been here to promote music. I found great help, beginning with someone making a DYK nomination for my first (deleted) article before I even knew what the abbreviation stood for. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Today: 3 DYK, including that the author dedicated a summer story to a license plate number ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello ,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our  Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but  there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software. Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for MindaRyn
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Asian Month Query
If we keep the fountain tool technicalities aside, will converting redirect to mainspace article be accepted as per rules?  Saha ❯❯❯  Stay safe    17:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Jill Harris
Hello! I have been considering making an article for Jill Harris for some time now. I noticed you currently have the old deleted article in your userspace. If you have no future plans for it, could you move it into my userspace so I can work on it? Thanks. Link20XX (talk) 22:54, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I see. I notice the page was recreated as a redirect a while back, so what I'll do is I'll replace the redirect with the draft and you can take over from there. Thanks for the help!  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Asian Month again
I tried unsuccessfully to add Luidia maculata with the fountain tool. It is a new article, but it replaces a redirect. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I can't remember if converted redirects count as new articles (the rules only explicitly state that expanding even stubs doesn't count as new), but in any case you can add the article to Wikipedia Asian Month/Submissions for review.  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 07:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have done that, but am not too bothered as to whether it is included. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Please review my previously rejected pages for the Wikipedia Asian Month 2021
I have made edits to all following pages that you have rejected earlier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanthoxylum_austrosinense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanthoxylum_avicennae https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanthoxylum_dissitum

Please review them again. Thanks in advance. AbundantReal (talk) 16:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Update (2021-11-15) For all the aforementioned articles it says that the issues have been addressed ((2021/11/13): Issues have been addressed.). One of the three articles has been changed into accepted status, thanks for that.

However the following two articles still aren't accepted in the Fountain tool: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanthoxylum_avicennae

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanthoxylum_dissitum

Please accept them.

Kind regards, AbundantReal (talk) 09:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 10:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Request
I appreciate your volunteering of time and effort to review this. But because it has become needlessly personalized (check history for removed antagonism), I request that you not review future DYKs I nominate. Urve (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Noted. I apologize for my tone earlier in the nomination. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 10:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, I sincerely apologize for those comments I made earlier and I'll try to avoid them from now on. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 11:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I trust that you're trying your best, as we all are. There are always "emotional aspects of building an encyclopedia", and we can get carried away. I don't think any less of you - your contributions to DYK make this place better. I just prefer lower stakes and lower temperatures, so as long as you're willing to remember the human component of our discussions, I'm happy to work with you at DYK or elsewhere in the future - consider the request lifted. Feel free to remove this section of your talk - we're on the same page, no need to have this be a yoke. Urve (talk) 11:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2020 Postcard
Dear Participants, Jury members and Organizers,

Congratulations!

It's Wikipedia Asian Month's honor to have you all participated in Wikipedia Asian Month 2020, the sixth Wikipedia Asian Month. Your achievements were fabulous, and all the articles you created make the world can know more about Asia in different languages! Here we, the Wikipedia Asian Month International team, would like to say thank you for your contribution also cheer for you that you are eligible for the postcard of Wikipedia Asian Month 2020. Please kindly fill the form, let the postcard can send to you asap!


 * This form will be closed at February 15.
 * For tracking the progress of postcard delivery, please check this page.

Cheers!

Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team, 2021.01

Wikipedia Asian Month 2020 Postcard
Dear Participants and Organizers,

Kindly remind you that we only collect the information for Wikipedia Asian Month postcard 15/02/2021 UTC 23:59. If you haven't filled the Google form, please fill it asap. If you already completed the form, please stay tun, wait for the postcard and tracking emails.

Cheers!

Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team, 2021.01

Regarding the Article: Shī Chéng
Hello, Thanks a lot for Reviewing my works. I am so overwhelmed by your efforts that you are putting to uplifting the Wikipedians, As Regarding the article upon Shi Cheng, I ve' further tried my best to make it met with the Wiki's general guidelines. Please have a look @ it and please do let me know Further if there is still anything to do so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shi_Cheng

With Respect n Regards, Looking Forward Saad Ullah Bhatti 23:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Articles still unmarked for Asian month
Why mark 308 articles, but not the other five? The count has been stalled for almost two days now. I ask because two out these five articles are mine. I am not sure that it matters since I already have four marked articles. All the same, it seems curious. ThuDauMot (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I just got a bit busy over the last few days so I haven't had the time to judge things again. Also note that while submissions are now closed, the actual judging is still ongoing so no need to worry. It's getting late over here so I'll take a look at them again tomorrow. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 14:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ThuDauMot (talk) 23:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Asian Month
hello, I am eligible to receive an asian month postcard as more than 4 of my articles were accepted, what do I have to do next to get it? - Seb { 💬  Talk  + 📝  Edits  } 17:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you already accomplished the form? If so, you'll just have to wait. The postcards will take several months to be shipped. For example, I was eligible for a post card in WAM 2020, but it took until July or August 2021 to be shipped a physical card. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 22:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have not filled out the form yet, could you give me a link to the form? - Seb { 💬  Talk  + 📝  Edits  } 23:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm not sure if it's been made or sent yet. But what happened in previous years was that you'd be sent a Google Form where you'd input your shipping address. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 23:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Please Re-Review Wiki Article
Hello,

Hope you are doing well, I ve' earlier Improved the non accepted / rejected article (WAM 2021). If you please kindly review it back for me so that I would get towards the possibility. Thanks for ur corporation n understanding.

Thanks n Regards, Saad Ullah Bhatti 22:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC) Are you talking about Shī Chéng? Unfortunately the promotional wording is still there so I can't approve it right now. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 23:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Sir Please Check it @ once ! As I ve Just even now also done with removing all the promotional wordings. Hardly 1 to 2 of any such stuff you will see here.

Also, I may not be a writer of qualities, But really want to make it one day. So For this You are there, The Wiki is there <3 !

For your lasting response n coordination, I am heavily thankful to you again so much.

Looking Forward,

Regards Saad Ullah Bhatti 23:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The wording is improved but there are still issues that need to be addressed here. Maybe could be of help here as well. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 23:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Yes he is :) . Saad Ullah Bhatti 04:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, As we talked earlier, With your kind efforts; the Article on Shi Cheng has been updated n improved for a long now. Along with you I was also helped out by an experienced editor as well who was referred by you. If you please take a notice on the work and kindly provide your opinion. It would be of a great help. Regards by Saad Ullah Bhatti 17:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name

 * Going by your ORCP, you're long overdue running the gauntlet! -- TNT (talk • she/they) 23:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What they said. Everyone said you'd do great in 2018 so with three years more experience I'd imagine you've only gotten better. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would add to this as well, but do explain why your last non-April Fool's AfD was in January 2019. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for the offer. However, I do not have any interest in applying for adminship at this time, not just due to the stresses of RfA, but also because I'm busy with my personal life and I feel that I cannot handle the responsibilities involved with the tools. Also, I try to avoid drama boards like the plague unless absolutely necessary, so yeah ;) As for the AFD things, I have sort of retired from doing deletion nominations as I'm mainly focusing on DYK work now, so I just don't really have the time to participate in deletion discussions anymore. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 00:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Understandable, but I do hope you'll reconsider in the future! -- TNT (talk • she/they) 00:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough on all counts, but you do have my support should you reconsider. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 01:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think you would be perfect. We could always use another helping hand with DYKs... Don't be afraid to ask for some nominators who can get you started down the path. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Rico Sasaki
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 02:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi
how are you can help me and  review 1 and 2 please and what is your opinion, ? --My Name is Aslan (talk) 13:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, and thanks for the message. I don't really do AfC reviewing anymore, but I can say that right now either article is ready for mainspace just yet, since both are in need of copyediting for grammar and tone. If you want, you can ask another editor for help in copyediting the pages so that they'll eventually be ready. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 13:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you copy the pages to your sandbox please I hope you help and work on them Since you have the experience, I hope you can help me Thank you --My Name is Aslan (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the offer but as a general rule I don't really work on articles outside my main interest areas anymore (meaning Japanese pop culture), so I won't be of much help to you at the moment. All I can do right now is give you advice, which is to ask for a copyedit from an experience copyeditor. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 13:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you know an editor interested in journalists who can help? Thank you--My Name is Aslan (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure if I can be of much help there unfortunately. You may have better luck asking WT:JOURNALISM or WT:TURKEY in this case. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 13:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK help
Hello, you reviewed two of my DYK nominations in the past. I do not know if I can request you check this out. If that is possible, kindly find the link below. Thank you.

Template:Did you know nominations/Sandy Heribert. Ampimd (talk) 23:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Not at home right now but I can take a look later. <B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 03:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bubble (2022 film)
Hello, Narutolovehinata5,

Thank you for creating Bubble (2022 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article needs more references to meet notability. See WP:SIGCOV"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Whiteguru. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Shigemasa Igawa, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 20:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).