User talk:Narwaro

Welcome!
Removed old sections Narwaro (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Nakon 02:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

approval of pending on FC Bayern Munich
Managers do not change until their contract is enacted. For the German leagues (and most others in Europe) that date is 1 July. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Did not know that, the edit did not look like vandalism, so I approved it. I will revert it, thanks for the notice.

Narwaro (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. Narwaro (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Careful reviewing
Please take care when deciding to approve changes such as this. Check the sources and, if necessary, check the page history. Happy editing! Rivertorch FIREWATER  00:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I have noticed your reviewing as well. Here are just a few other examples from the last three days where you should have been more careful: this edit, this edit and this edit. Please look a bit closer and take a bit more time for each review. Thank you. Felida97 (talk) 17:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notice. I am still wrapping my mind around reviewing and occasionally caught off-guard by subtle vandalism, which sometimes looks very unsuspicious if a topic is entirely unknown to me. This issue will surely fade with time and experience, thanks for your understanding. Narwaro (talk) 17:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Also this. The IP did not provide any source but you accepted it. Baby miss fortune 11:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * On the same note, Narwaro, I would like to make you aware that, if you accept an edit, the things you write in that review box are only visible in the advanced review log and are not displayed in the revision history. So, it doesn't make sense to address an editor directly (like "Please add the source for this") as you did with the edit mentioned above. You could/should have reverted this edit with something like that in the edit summary. Felida97 (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * That was my kryptonite with this edit. Thanks for the notice. Narwaro (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages - Bad Pending Changes Acceptance
I see you recently accepted a pending change to July 31. I looked for a source for this date of birth in the her bio that I could add to the DOY page and it was unsupported by any source there either.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

Please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for making me aware of that, I just checked if the page exists and the information matches, I have not checked for sources. Narwaro (talk) 14:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I see you are still ignoring BLP in your pending changes patrol and accepting bad edits. (Thanks  for reverting this.)   What's it going to take for you to get it?  Do you want me to request that the privilege be removed? Toddst1 (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I will not review any more Day of the pages, I seem too be too dumb to do that properly. Narwaro (talk) 22:17, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Feh screenshot.png
You uploaded or restored, File:Feh screenshot.png, but for various reasons did not add an information block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include own in the relevant source field, amend the information added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add  and an  to the media by uploader or presumed_self tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the information where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or own, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log].

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I have added Own work to the author field. Narwaro (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:ZathuraLatestVersion


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:ZathuraLatestVersion, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MunicipalityNavigationBar
Template:MunicipalityNavigationBar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. WOSlinker (talk) 13:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Frank Wilhelm-Mauch


Hello, Narwaro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frank Wilhelm-Mauch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Vimb hinting.png


The file File:Vimb hinting.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused Wikipedia-specific screenshot"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Vimb screenshot.png


The file File:Vimb screenshot.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused Wikipedia-specific screenshot"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VimbLatestVersion
Template:VimbLatestVersion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)