User talk:Narwhal2

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Narwhal2! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Eli +  14:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Baalbek
Hey mate, thanks for your contributions on baalbek, i was thinking the entire ruins section should be split from the city article and moved to a new article (we could name it "Baalbek temple complex) or something, i will work on the matter when i have more time,

I want to tell about citing reference, you should say where you got your info or your contributions may be challenged for accuracy, in order to write your sources copy these syntax and fill in the blanks: for websites

For books

for journals here's an example You can always ask me anything on my talk page, just click on the "+" sign in my signature Eli  +  14:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Reply:

Thanks. I would cite a reference, but I have never found one. But I was there last year and the guy who looks after the quarry (has a cafe there) said there is a smaller stone in the next quarry. I went and measured it, and it was substantially bigger. Don't have the measurements with me, but I seem to remember a meter wider and two meters longer. The evidence is in the photo.


 * Hey mate, I'm so glad you are so passionate about the site, i'm sure you'll be hooked on wikipedia too, passion is great but "the man at the cafe" is not a reference :D  Beware of  original research, it can destroy an articles credibility, just like unreferenced controversial passages. Whenever i have trouble finding sources i go to the local library, better yet i go to | google books and enter my query there, often with great success since there are many limited preview books that provide great material. I searched google books for baalbek and there is a ton of books on its roman architecture, im just waiting for some free time to tackle the article. maybe we could join forces ;P   Eli  +  09:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * where are you from?? Eli  +  09:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Holland. I visit most of these ancient sites, and Baalbek is about the best. I have uploaded a pic of the underground tunnels. The two building eras is very clear on this pic, and if the arch is Roman, as it appears, then the lower sections must be much older.

File copyright problem with File:Baalbeck-tunnels.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Baalbeck-tunnels.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I did say it was my photo, so I don't know what you deleted it.

.

Ralph Ellis
Please read WP:RS and WP:SPS - Ellis is a minor fringe author who publishes his own books, and doesn't belong in our articles. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 21:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)


 * You've started to add this again. Please stop. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 18:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I've raised the issue here . It looks as though you need to read WP:COI. Dougweller (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Just a note for future readers, this editor has uploaded a file and identified himself as Ralph Ellis when he uploaded it. Dougweller (talk) 19:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 

I suggest you rewrite your comment to focus on the content dispute rather than on other editors. --Ronz (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't make your concerns about and editor's behavior sidetrack you from participating in dispute resolution on article content issues.
 * If and editor is misbehaving, take your concerns to a proper venue such as WP:WQA or follow the suggestions at WP:DE.
 * If you simply don't understand another editor's perspective, ask questions and seek clarification. --Ronz (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TFOWR 18:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Elagabalus coin athena.jpg


The file File:Elagabalus coin athena.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:British penny coin.jpg


The file File:British penny coin.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)