User talk:NaseebaLatheef

October 2023
Hello, I'm Belbury. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mammootty filmography seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See WP:PEACOCK. Belbury (talk) 11:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 08:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rorschach (film), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mammootty, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 22:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Mammootty. Thank you. NoNAja (talk) 12:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Updating figures without updating sources
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mammootty. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Next block will be longer
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * (to NaseebaLatheef) It doesn't matter if you are right and everyone else is wrong. WP:3RR applies. Either you can choose to discuss a dispute or find yourself blocked again for edit warring if you keep it up after the block expires. See also Dispute resolution. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Four times now you have added phrasing of "widely regarded as one of the greatest Indian actors" regarding Mammooty to two different articles . Four times it's been reverted. I'm curious. Do you think that doing it a fifth time will be the magic number that makes it stick? 10? 20? 100? How many times do you have to be reverted on this before you stop? You've been blocked for editing warring recently. If you keep this up, it is highly likely you will be blocked again, and this time for a lot longer. I strongly suggest you stop. PLEASE read WP:PEACOCK, and learn to work with this community of editors, and not against it. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)