User talk:Nashapapa

Welcome!

Hello, Nashapapa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nasha phansangiam, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Phil ip.t.day  talk  09:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Nasha phansangiam


A tag has been placed on Nasha phansangiam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phil ip.t.day  talk  09:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Future releases
Information about future releases for actors, musicians, etc., (such as you were adding to Bridgit Mendler) must be accompanied by a reliable source; even then we may not include the info if it isn't completely confirmed per WP:CRYSTAL. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 12:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elise Delise


The article Elise Delise has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * TV show appears unnotable, standard google search turns up nothing (and I mean nothing), fails WP:GNG. None of the speedy criteria applied though

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. doom gaze  (talk)  12:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Elise Delise for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elise Delise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elise Delise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. doom gaze  (talk)  12:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elise Delise


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Elise Delise, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 12:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. andy (talk) 12:31, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Victoria Justice, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. andy (talk) 13:01, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * And for adding hoax info past your final warning, you will now be reported and likely blocked from editing. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 04:55, 13 April 2011 (UTC)