User talk:Nashpaul

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Tim Vickers 22:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of Clarendon Market Common
A tag has been placed on Clarendon Market Common, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 19:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scientific teaching
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scientific teaching, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

The reason I have put a Proposed Deletion notice on your page Scientific teaching is that it seems you are planning to use it as part of a teaching exercise. This may give rise to problems because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and, although anyone may contribute, there are strict standards for what sort of articles are acceptable; and also because any editor may edit any article; you cannot require that your page is edited only by the members of your summer school. Experience has shown that although use of Wikipedia in a teaching context can be useful it needs to be carefully prepared, and the nature of Wikipedia fully understood by those in charge, if the experience is not to be frustrating and unsatisfactory both for those involved and for other Wikipedia editors who have to clear up. For further information, please look at the guideline School and University Projects, as well as the general guidelines linked from the Welcome paragraph above. I am sorry to seem unwelcoming, but Wikipedia is not a web-hosting service; if what you want is a "private" project page which the members of your summer school can edit collaboratively without outside interference, you should look for another web host. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If your intention is that the eventual output should be a Wikipedia article, one possibility would be to set up a subpage in your user space - e.g. type "User:Nashpaul/Scientific teaching" in the search box, or whatever title you choose, as long as it starts "User:Nashpaul/ " - see WP:User page for more detail. Then the members of your group could work on a draft there, without it being subject to editing by "outsiders", and when complete it could be moved into article space. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

George W. Beadle Award
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of George W. Beadle Award, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.genetics-gsa.org/pages/beadleaward.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I have had to delete this article, and also the article on the Elizabeth Jones award, because of the extent to which they have been copied form the pages at the GSA site.

You must not copy from a web site, even one with which you are affiliated -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you you can arrange for the material to be licensed   according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

The Beadle article, for example, talked a little to much about his career--it's covered in the article on him; in the other direction, the Jones article gave no context.

In addition, a Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. That the prize was given to eminent people is not quite enough: there needs to be some sources--preferably from outside the Society. What is ideally wanted is some sort of third party statement that the award is the major national award in the field--even though you may understandably think it obvious.

What I'd suggest, is that you instead =-- or also -- write article on those to whom the award has been given, but who do not currently have articles. And even Jones, who is certainly highly notable, does not have a page.

Please check the other articles you've written on genetics prizes to ensure that nothing in them is copied either--neither directly copied nor Close paraphrase,

This is really important. We care very much about respecting others' copyrights., and will not knowingly include anything that may violate it--it's one of our strictest rules, and I, and all other people here too, will rigorously enforce it.  DGG ( talk ) 03:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Genetics Society of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Johnston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello. Your recent edit to University School of Nashville appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Huell Howser and Rosalind Helderman are notable but require citations confirming they attended.  Gab4gab (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David W. Fraser


A tag has been placed on David W. Fraser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.swarthmore.edu/swarthmore-college-presidents/david-w-fraser. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  DGG ( talk ) 22:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ASTC LOGO TWO LINE RED.png
Thanks for uploading File:ASTC LOGO TWO LINE RED.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of American Society of Plant Biologists


A tag has been placed on American Society of Plant Biologists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://aspb.org/about/ and Text present from original edit.. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Star  Mississippi  14:49, 17 December 2022 (UTC)