User talk:Nasirsharif007

In response to your feedback
Hi Nasirsharif,

Glad to have you here.

When you start editing the article, you can see that article headings are displayed between 1 or more '='-symbols. You can simply change the text between them to update the heading itself. The amount of symbols indicates the order of the headings: 3 symbols on each side means it will appear as a child section under a 2 symbol heading and so on. You can read more about heading here.

If you are talking about editing the article title itself, this is only possible by moving the entire page. Read about it here, but discuss on an article's talk page before you decide on something. It is always appreciated!

Feel free to contact the Helpdesk or me if you have further questions. Regards,

Pim Rijkee (talk) 05:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

May 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Ajeenkya Patil. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 08:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ajeenkya Patil. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --DAJF (talk) 08:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

January 2014
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ajeenkya Patil, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 07:54, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Nasirsharif007. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ajeenkya Patil, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 08:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)