User talk:Nasiryounus/Archive 4

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Divine Signs (HA).png
Thank you for uploading File:Divine Signs (HA).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Divine Signs (HA).png
Thank you for uploading File:Divine Signs (HA).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Please do not create unconstructive or misleading redirects, as you did with Imam Mehdi. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Also applies to similar redirects and some concurrent edits by 82.43.41.21 to Imam Mahdi and Mehdi. Looks like the same user.  Esowteric + Talk  22:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry. It won't happen again. I've read the guidelines and understand why my edits have been reverted.Nasiryounus (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010: Sufism
There is an ongoing edit war in the article Sufism in the Sufi Sheikhs -> Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi sub-section of the article. Could we please discuss this issue on the talk page? See Edit war. Thanks.  Esowteric + Talk  10:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure.Nasiryounus (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010: Younus AlGohar
Hello, as there has been a lot of vandalism and edit warring on the article Younus AlGohar, I have created a section on Talk:Younus AlGohar called "Edit Warring", where I'd like us to discuss whatever changes needed to be made to the article in a constructive and civilized manner. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 00:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

Thanks
I appreciate your help with editing Messiah Foundation International and Younus AlGohar, as well as your efforts to stop the vandalism there. Also, it was nice to see that you were courteous enough to thank Acather96 at User talk:Acather96 for their help on reverting vandalism on my talk page. I'm glad someone showed their appreciation for those who try to keep the environment in Wikipedia pleasant. And I agree, the constant vandalism is getting really annoying. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

RAGS International
Hey again. I made RAGS International a disambig page so as to avoid trouble among editors with different viewpoints- it looks like that isn't working out though. Since lately editors (a single editor?) have been reverting the RAGS International page to redirect to Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, and I noticed you've been reverting them back to the disambiguation page, I thought I would let you know that I made a section in Talk: RAGS International to address the issue with those who keep redirecting. Although, I don't see what the issue is since Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi is linked in the disambiguation page also- but I think this way there's a better chance of avoiding an edit war and/or dispute this way. Please leave you comments at the talk page, and thanks. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC))
 * Once again I would like to thank you for your reasonable reply to Iamsaa on my talk page. I think though, it would be better to not debate with them over who is affiliated with whom (he mentions on his talk page that he is an official of Anjuman-e-Safroshan-e-Islam, an organization that links itself to Gohar Shahi but has incredibly hard feelings for Messiah Foundation International) as this will just cause an unnecessarily long debate with the editor(s). I do appreciate your intentions, but the editor doesn't seem to understand English well and doesn't quite understand what I say when I try to reason with them. To avoid all these edit wars on all pages related to Gohar Shahi, I think it would be best to not challenge their claims (even if they are absurd) and try to reach an agreement with them. If in the next few days a consensus cannot be reached with the editor, I'll put up an RFC tag on all the concerned articles so that we can get more opinions in. Thanks for your help, keep up the good work. Omi( ☺ ) 23:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I am satisfied with what you've come up for the betterment of this article, and hope best for your editing, because these vandal-prone lads are quite a headache. Anyway, again, I'll continue to improve this article as much as I can, in the best interest of Wikipedia.-- N Y7  ☆ 00:26, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Your file uploads
Hi there, in response to your latest upload File:Sri Lanka (3).JPG—the file you uploaded is automatically nominated for speedy deletion because you indicated that only Wikipedia has permission to use this file. Because Wikipedia depends largely on free content, files must be open to be used on Wikipedia and for commercial use. If you own the copyright of the files you upload and would like them to be used for these purposes, there are several compatible licenses you may use, including GFDL-self, cc-by-sa-3.0 and PD-self (make sure to read the templates); otherwise, the file will have to be deleted under our speedy deletion criteria. — ξ xplicit  02:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet?
Have you seen the contributions of User: Truefighter? They're all related to MFI or Younus AlGohar and pretty much involve removing information relating to them on miscellaneous pages such as MFI and June 16 births. And the edits are very similar to An Ip on whose page I left a warning about vandalism. They also made the exact edits to RAGS International and The Representative of Gohar Shahi as User: Falconkhe. I smell sockpuppet of either the IP or User: Falconkhe. What do you think? Maybe I'm just getting cynical from all the recent vandalism on those pages. I'm thinking to report them, but it seems too early to tell if they are the same person. I thought I'd draw your attention to it though. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 00:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I do suppose it looks fishy. Let's see the outcome.-- N Y7  ☆ 00:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Younus AlGohar
Please provide a source for 11 Master's Degrees, and stop removing the refimprove tag, since this article is already short of reliable third-party sources. If there's a problem with this, please discuss on the Talk page, otherwise I will lock this article until the matter is determined. Thanks. Rodhull andemu  19:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for the '[WP:REDFLAG|11 Master's Degrees]]', as I thought you were one of the recent IPs such as 'Falconkhe' and a few others, and thus 'undid' your edit. I removed the refimprove tag because, I thought the article didn't lack citations. I mean, the IP 'Falconkhe' was tagging unnecessary and caused nonconstructive edits, and has continuously been adding the refimprove tag. When asked for a justification, he answers with unreasonable reasons which do not answer the question.-- N Y7  ☆ 19:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I see another editor has removed the 11 degrees, for the same reason. It seems that most of the article is sourced, so perhaps that "refimprove" is unnecessary. You'll see from my User page that I'm not one of the other IPs. Cheers. Rodhull  andemu  19:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I understood that, and I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, but thanks for the clarification. :) x-- N Y7  ☆ 19:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

The Sockpuppet
Hey, I saw Falconkhe's copy-pasting of your warning onto your talk page as if trying to pass it off as if you had been changing people's comments on talk pages (I've removed it- I hope you don't mind, but its ridiculous). This is suspiciously similar to vandalism from various IP's on my talk page when I warned them. Honestly, this is looking more and more like sockpuppetting to me. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 06:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

STOP VIOLATING & USING WIKIPEDIA FOR YOUR ORGANIZATION'S PUBLISHMENT
Omi, you have reverted my comments, which you dont have rights, I assume you & NY are the same person having two different ID. I request you to please stop violating and using wikipedia to publicize your organization and leader younus.--Falconkhe (talk) 06:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, I did not violate any rules here, I posted onto your talk page:

" Please refrain from changing my comments in discussion boards, as you have done so in the discussion board of Messiah Foundation International. I understand that we are to assume good faith with fellow editors, but please do not drag your sectarian issues to such a point where sanity is lost.-- NY7 ☆ 22:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)", which you then copy-pasted onto my own talk page. Now that's pathetic, and I've not manipulated with anybody's comments on any discussion page or anywhere else for that matter.

And just to get back to me for noticing that you and many IPs are quite alike, you said that me and Omi are one person? I won't even answer that; and do trust me not to remind you again, that I am not a member of the MFI, nor have any intentions to become part of it, I am interested in this topic, hence am contributing towards it.-- N Y7  ☆ 07:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, anyone is allowed to revert vandalism. If we were the same person, we wouldn't be talking to each other. Sorry nasir for this happening on your talk page- I know how annoying it is. Falconkhe, please try to be a little more civil less accusatory. I really don't like having to explain this over and over again. Next time, if you have to talk to me, do so on my talk page please. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 07:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, you are violating wikipedia as same person like id of omi and you are the same user and you are removing WP tags and making pages disamb with no reason. I request you to please stop using wikipedia to publicize your cult and leader i.e. younus.--Falconkhe (talk) 07:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I am not its reality one user is using two IDs and talking with the other ID just to dodge others.--Falconkhe (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No Omi, I understand. This guys just ridiculous.-- N Y7  ☆ 07:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Messiah Foundation International has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 04:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've done so because, a random ID which is using many randoms IPs as well has been making adding the tag, and many admins have agreed that the page doesn't need it, hence I removed it. If you look at the history, you'd see. The ID (Falconkhe) has continuously making such edits, and has done so in the past on Younus AlGohar, which was yesterday protected for the same reason. -- N Y7  ☆ 04:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, Thanks for your comments NY, which were too accusatory. Well I have always mentioned facts and the fact is that you want to promot Younus and his organization and using wikipedia for this purpose. First of all his actual name is Muhammad Younus and not younus algoher. The second thing, which made you (NY) emotional (which clearly shows that you are not neutral editor) when I ask for reliable sources but you always come up with self publish (Own) webs references, which are not accepted on wikipedia. I am asking for authentic and reliable information for readers of wikipedia. Did I do something wrong, its you who wants Edit War not me. You seems very rigid to promote your cause but wikipedia is not suitable place for you to do a thing like this.--Falconkhe (talk) 06:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry Nasir, this is the exact same comment Falconkhe posted on all the Gohar Shahi talk pages to me. I replied in detail once and for all on Talk: Younus AlGohar. This is getting ridiculous, and makes very clear Falconkhes COI (e.g. supporting the move to Muhammad Younus when legally its Younus AlGohar and is also the name hes most referred to. Also, this user isnt even taking into account that in the very first sentence its mentioned what AlGohar's birth name is). By the way, I've been copy-editing Messiah Foundation International for neutrality. I've been reviewing it and there are some rough patches that need to be reworded for neutrality. Could you look over it as well? Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 07:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


 * If I was allowed to let Wikipedia know that I'd lost my patience, it would be now. Omi, this guy is really ridiculous. Of the millions times that I've told him that I am not associated with the MFI nor its CEO, it never does seem to ring a bell.-- N Y7  ☆ 04:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You are not linked to Younus MFI, that's why you are getting emotional on this issue. --Falconkhe (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you understand the word 'emotions'? You, accusing me of stuff is going to (naturally) make me uncomfortable, which is an emotion that arises when you are being alleged continuously. Now, for the uncounted-number of times, please stop being so irritating.-- N Y7  ☆ 07:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah don't worry he said the same thing about me. This issue with him is, i think, way past dispute resolution- this is such a personal issue to him! I've asked a couple of admins if they think its necessary to jump to arbitration for the article Younus AlGohar..I haven't gotten replies, but I think this will be necessary to finally be able to edit the article without having an edit war every 3 days. Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 10:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. N Y7  ☆ 18:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay cool. By the way, I've reported Falconkhe to Wikiquette alerts. I mentioned him messing with your comments and that he accuses me of being a sockpuppet of you, as well as promoting AlGohar. I've had enough of this...its very clear to me he doesnt care at all about dispute resolution- it seems like theyre just trying to push their POV. On the noticeboard they also accused me of promoting Younus AlGohar and requested that I be banned from Wikipedia for being "too POV". Its funny how they, instead of addressing concerns about them, resort to accusing others (without basis, I might add) as a form of distraction. Anyway, you might want to check out the discussion on them and add to it if they've been acting out of line with you again. (I.e accusing you of promoting AlGohar whenever you try to discuss their edits with them) Omirocksthisworld( Drop a line ) 01:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
For the recognition... I appreciate it. I've left something pretty on your page as well :). Omirocksthisworld</b>( Drop a line ) 01:53, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks x-- N Y7  ☆ 23:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

RFC: Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi and associated pages
Hi, regarding the long-running content disputes over articles and pages relating to Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, I have opened an WP:RFC. Please see: Talk:Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi. Thanks,  Esowteric + Talk  11:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * There is a no dispute whether Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi actually died, disappeared, or went into "occultation". We believe that he went into Occultation on 25th November 2001. The only organization HE founded was Anjuman Serfroshan-e-Islam and not MFI. Younus has nothing to do with Gohar Shahi, younus is using the name and pictures of Gohar Shahi for his ill-deeds. Through,RAGS International, The Representative of Gohar Shahi & Messiah Foundation International, Younus AlGohar, younus and his companion are using Wikipedia for self promotion of his self-made teachings. So, my point of view is that Younus should stopped on this stage, he shouldn't allow to use wikipedia for his ill-deeds.--Falconkhe (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but there is clearly disupute over this issue. There are articles and information, let me mention that they are reputable, that mention all sorts of things regarding Shahi and AlGohar, and they do seem connected somehow, hence, disputes need to be resolved, and it'd be much appreciated if you too participated. Thanks-- N Y7  ☆ 13:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Stop reverting to your favouritwe version, there is no agreement at all. Off2riorob (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Discussion
Please leave the article alone and discuss on the talkpage I am attempting to tidy the citations Off2riorob (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The article I've reverted is from earlier on this morning. And it meets the expectations that we've discussed on the talk page over the few hours, including the death or "disappearance" issue. This is a more broader article with more information regarding the subject, it'd much appreciated if you tidied the cites on this, and trust me I really do appreciate it. Thanks a lot. The edit-war is finally coming to an end, thank GOD!-- N Y7  ☆ 16:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Picture
Hi, where did you get from? have you got the original picture and did you take it yourself? Off2riorob (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC) I met a follower of Shahi a couple of months who kindly lent me this picture, I've scanned it and thought it would be a good picture to go with the Wikipedia article. The follower took the picture personally and had allowed me to use it on my blog, so I suppose it wouldn't be much a problem on Wikipedia. I fixed it up on Photoshop as well, as it is around a decade old. What do you think?-- N Y7  ☆ 19:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; Scientizzle 19:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the notification. But I've tried talking to those vandalists like a dozen times. I've requested them on their talk pages to discuss their dispute and difference in thoughts, but they never seem to reply and always go on about establishing the "truth" and that they are on the "right" path. They make unconstructive and innecessary edits to the Messiah Foundation International and Younus AlGohar articles because of some sectarian issues and lack to provide reliable and complete information on Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the article of his subject. Thus, I took out time to re-do the Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, did some homework on him and related subjects and have constructed a sourced and well-kept article. Just waiting for support on the issue on the talk page.-- N Y7  ☆ 19:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps it would be best to let User: Falconkhe have his way with RAGS International, the Representative of Gohar Shahi and pages similar to this- if you think about it, the energy wasted on reverting his edits there could be used somewhere else, a lot more constructively. Plus, his edits don't really take away from the meaning of the titles, as he usually redirects to the Gohar Shahi page. At the very least, leaving his edits for now until people from RFC reply will probably be better. <b style="color:#32B430;">Omirocksthisworld</b>( Drop a line ) 20:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Images
Hi, I nominated File:Akshaye-khanna-250x340-2008-12-03.jpg, File:Johnny Lever.jpg, and File:Priyanshu chatterjee01.jpg for deletion as copyright violations, and File:MFI Logo.png for deletion as an unused non-free image. Hekerui (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC) I undestand the others, but why has File:MFI Logo.png been uploaded for deletion, please explain before you delete it. N Y7  ☆ 22:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Nasiryounus. Thank you.--Your Message (talk) 12:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Iamsaa. Given his dedication to not spare "lier Younus", he'll probably be back- but hopefully he'll understand that cooperation with other editors is necessary. I think the best way to avoid another messy situation like this is to be non-confrontational about it to the other party, and perhaps take a leaf out of Esowteric's book and add references from both groups' websites when editing Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi and articles related to him. <b style="color:#32B430;">Omirocksthisworld</b>( Drop a line ) 21:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Akshaye-khanna-250x340-2008-12-03.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Akshaye-khanna-250x340-2008-12-03.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Akshaye-khanna-250x340-2008-12-03.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Akshaye-khanna-250x340-2008-12-03.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Cactus Writer |   needles  20:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sarkar Ra (627).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sarkar Ra (627).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 20:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sarkar Ra (627).jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarkar Ra (627).jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Off2riorob (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
ww2censor (talk) 23:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

COI? Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, Younus AlGohar and related articles
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.

Please consider the above when editing any of the following fiercely-disputed articles:
 * Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi
 * Messiah Foundation International
 * Younus AlGohar
 * RAGS International
 * The Representative of Gohar Shahi
 * The Representative of Imam Mehdi

Many thanks for your consideration and cooperation.  Esowteric + Talk  12:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents
In all fairness, I've had to bring your name up at this AN/I thread. Please comment and respond there. Many thanks,  Esowteric + Talk  13:11, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the award. I always feel a bit bad when awards come as a result of conflict: I only aimed to "keep the fight clean" and make it easier for editors and admin to work in these articles.

Nevertheless, thanks Nasir. It's appreciated. Keep up the good work yourself.  Esowteric + Talk  08:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. x :) --- Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  22:20, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
I appreciate the recognition, thanks! Nuujinn (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC) No problem x All the best. -- Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  01:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case: cleared and closed
Hi, just to let you know that at Sockpuppet investigations they found no sign of sockpuppeting by you, Omirocksthisworld or RayStar77. You can find the archived case here. Regards,  Esowteric + Talk  09:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC) Thank you very much x -- Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  21:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi
Hey there Nasir :). I've noticed that the Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi articles in other languages haven't yet been updated, and it is still written, among other things, that Shahi died. I myself am not so great with Urdu script, but would you be able to update the article on the Urdu Wikipedia? <b style="color:#32B430;">Omirocksthisworld</b>( Drop a line ) 00:02, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I'd love to, but the most I can do atm is keep an eye on the articles. A bit busy with college and other activities, though I'd love to. If there's anything I can help out with, please let me know. Thanks for asking x -- Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  00:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

University of Cambridge article
I have removed your additions to this article again, that section is a mess and needs deleting or re-working, but Younus AlGohar does not merit inclusion, however important he may be to you alongside the other much more notable religious figures mentioned in that list. Ajbpearce (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Just thought it would be a good addition to the names mentioned.  Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  19:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I wish to agree with Ajbpearce. Your editing is beginning to seem promotional (POV) on this matter. Thanks, Ian Cairns (talk) 07:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Won't happen again, sir. Just thought it would'd be a good addition to the Alumni list.  Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  19:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Definitely, would love to. Thanks. -- Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  01:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Your Talk Page
Yes, I'd love to help. What kind of stuff do you want me to do?Acather96 (talk) 16:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Why thank you! Very kind of you x.

I'd just like it to be organised and well-set up. Clean to view etc. -- Nasir | ناصر یونس  chat?  21:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC) OK, I've added some templates to imrpove the usability of your page, and to keep it clutter free, have set up automatic archiving. If this doesnt appear to work, leave a note on my talk page and I'll try and work it out. This is my first time using automatic archiving, so I'll try my best. Hope you like the page! :) Acather96 (talk) 16:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Love the work-out on the page. Thanks man. :) Could you possibly fix up the User:page aswell? Nasir | ناصر یونس  chat?  21:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Will do :) Acather96 (talk) 16:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Sorry for taking a while to get back to you, its just I am really busy at the moment with stuff at WP:SCV. To be honest, while I am more than happy to help, I thought that, to be honest one of the users here would be better able to help you, as userpage re-design is there speciality. And whatever your desicion is, please drop me a message on my talk page. :) Acather96 (talk) 15:13, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion nomination of Talk:Al Hidayah
Hi Nasiryounus, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Talk:Al Hidayah. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot  (msg) 09:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Come copyedit if you're still interested!
Hello, I noticed that you signed up for WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010, but you haven't contributed yet. I want you to know that I'm available to you if you have any questions or needs. We'd still love to have you if you're interested. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 20:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

talk page
I rolled back your deletion, my feeling is that we're better off leaving the record intact so as to avoid any disputes about changing the record. That being said, it might be good to archive a good bit of it, what do you think? -- Nuujinn (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I suppose archiving a good bit of it is a good idea, as it may come handy in the future for references, or whatever rises up in the future. -- Dhulfikar  chat?  01:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

The Religion of God by Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi
I've uploaded an image for the, and hope its legit. I can't upload onto Shahi's article for now (because I'm not recognized editor just as yet) hence would appreciate it if you could upload the file. Thanks - MFI Media|Correspond 23:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Uhmm, okay. Sure, I'll upload it. I suppose its ok.  Dhulfikar  chat?  23:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Religion of God.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:The Religion of God.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

London Wikimedia Fundraiser
Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Christmas Card


Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)





GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:32, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 20:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:49, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)