User talk:Nasreyes95

June 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pussycat Dolls. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Nick Bush 07:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Pussycat Dolls. Nick Bush 07:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

July 2009
Your recent edit to Doll Domination (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 16:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Hush Hush
This is your only warning. please do not falsify chart positions. Billboard officially provides the US charts and im afraid to say that the pusssycat dolls song "Hush Hush; Hush Hush" did not reach number 1 and 2. please do not add this again or you will be banned! (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC))

Doll Domination
I have monitored your edits now for a while and they are unacceptable. i have reverted your edits to Doll Domination, as they are unsourced and irrelevant.

furthermore i have nominated your irrelevant article To Those Who Wait for deletion because you have copied Doll Domination for no reason and the information you have is just not true. the dolls are working on a new album but nothing is confirmed. certainly the album is not confirmed for a 2010 release.

Finally i previously warned you about falsifying information that has already been sourced. on the article Hush Hush] you changed sourced chart postions to false ones and failed to comply with rules regarding your edits - you were asked to use a WP:edit summary but have since failed to do so, you also did not respond to comments made on your talk page. I am putting in a requestion for administrators to be notified of your behaviour. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC))

August 2, 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next you changed sourced information, such as that you did on Doll Domination, you will be blocked from editing. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC))

You have been blocked from editing for 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your |talk page by adding the text. Kuru talk  21:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Nicole Slash.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Nicole Slash.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Nicole Slash.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Nicole Slash.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ignasio Reyes
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ignasio Reyes, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:400 pussycatdolls 090223 kwinter 84043791.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:400 pussycatdolls 090223 kwinter 84043791.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ashleyphotoshot.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Ashleyphotoshot.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:58, 19 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:58, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Carmit Bacharmiami.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Carmit Bacharmiami.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Kimberly Wyatt.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Kimberly Wyatt.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Normal ashley.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Normal ashley.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Alejandro (song)
Your edit is not supported by the source as such is will be reverted until you can add reliable sources to support your claim. SunCreator (talk) 21:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Waka Waka (This Time for Africa). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 02:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Headline
Born This Way is a song written by Lady Gaga. It serves as the title track of Gaga's third album, Born This Way. She first debuted an acapella line of the song after receiving her moon-man at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards, for "Video of the Year". Elton John described the song as a gay anthem but added later that it's a song for all people and not just for the gay community. She also tweeted the chorus on October 21, 2010. After her tweet, Perez Hilton, replied to her with "It doesn't matter where you come from or where you've been. What matters is that you're on the right track baby! And I am! I am!".

Lyrics
I'm beautiful in my way, 'Cause God makes no mistakes. I'm on the right track, baby, I was born this way.

Don't hide yourself in regret, just love yourself and you're set. I'm on the right track baby, I was Born This Way.

License tagging for File:BornTHisWay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BornTHisWay.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Unsourced
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2011 (U.S.), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 11:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)