User talk:NastalgicCam/Archives/June 2008

Type
Hey, cheers for the typo fix. I'm all to well known for typo's when I'm having a bit of a rant, lol. &#9775;Ferdia O'Brien (T) / (C) 08:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
I've enabled rollback on your account. Please read Rollback feature before use, if you haven't already done so. Good luck! —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 09:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Congratulations, Cam! Now you need to make extra sure that noone uses your computer while you're logged in. ;) Dreaded Walrus t c 10:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Haha thanks. I made sure to change my password since, and the culprit has been justly punished for his actions. He was on my MySpace, Tf2, amongst other things -CamT undefined 17:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Google domination
Why did you revert that? And you were too fast! -Spansign (talk) 08:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

AIV
Regarding this AIV report, before posting to AIV please make sure that the vandal has been issued with a final warning (one that states they will be blocked if they vandalise further), and that they have vandalised again after receiving that warning. Thanks TigerShark (talk) 09:19, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. I have never used Huggle but I do get a lot of replies from people saying that it can be the cause of this sort of confusion. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 09:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It has it's moments, but is fantastic for getting those nasty anonymous users blocked. -CamT undefined 09:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Republicanism in the UK
Edit wasn't vandalism, just common sense. If you want to edit the article so it's within wikipedia rules, or even the same format as the rest of the article, then fine, but don't just assume I deleted it in a vandalising fasion and put it back without even reading what you've just pu back in. TJ 1323 14/06/08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.88.155 (talk) 12:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah. I'm with the anon on this one, Cam. Reverting vandalism is good, but make sure you check each edit thoroughly to make sure that what you're reverting is vandalism. In this case, I'm sure you'll agree that the text the anon removed isn't really suitable for Wikipedia. Dreaded Walrus t c 12:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * While I never marked this as vandalism, I feel that a blatant removal of the context is uneeded, still. I sent a notice to the user about his removing of content, for the sake of letting it be known, that he was removing content that is still within context. I feel that, perhaps instead of removing it, the article could have been reworded, to be more befitting. My jurisdiction, though, is that it did not need to be removed without reasoning other than that "it didn't fit". And yes, I had read the context. -CamT undefined 04:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision to Jonathan Pollard article.
Why do you object to my revision? It's pointless to have the same sentence in two places in the same article. Not to mention, annoying.


 * I don't recall reverting anything on that article. Let me check my logs on huggle and my revertabot (my personal third party bot). I'll see if it has something to do with that. I'm in the testing stages of my bot to see how effectively it handles vandalism, etc. -CamT undefined 05:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Edit- Ok, i found out what happened. My bot saw you removed a large space (and I see that you are right about it being in there already) and thought you were blanking the page. It lists all edits under my username, because I haven't made it a bot account yet. -CamT undefined 19:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SkyEatsAirplaneShoot1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SkyEatsAirplaneShoot1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)