User talk:Nasty

Welcome!

Hello, Nasty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

"Broken address" link removed
In the edit you made to the Chevrolet Corvette on 02:15, 5 September 2006, you claimed you removed a link due to it being a "broken address". I'm not sure if you're internet connection isn't working properly of if you're just making it up to justify the deletion, but the following link you removed is clearly working properly.
 * *The Corvette Story - Complete Corvette history, with facts, options, performance statistics and photographs for all Corvette years.

I'm not saying it shouldn't have been removed, but I am saying don't lie about the reason you justify your edit. --Roguegeek Sorry, I tested the edit and it didn't work on my PC. My connection to the net works fine, so I assumed that the link was broken.

BMW M3 GTR
Hey dude, I saw you removed the BMW GTR from the "Nordschleife fastest lap times" saying it's not a street legal road car. You're wrong on that one. It is a street legal car. Suggest you change it back. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.87.109.82 (talk) 10:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you're right, the BMW M3 GTR is road legal, but as soon as you put slick tyres on it, it is not. If that time was done on road tyres, I'd happily add it back, but it wasn't. All the other times are by cars on road tyres. Personally, I believe that there is too little proper control of the entries on the list, including all the differences between the car and how it rolled off the production line. Nasty 22:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

honorable
hi as you started removing honorable mentions, could you remove all, there are plenty more .. --&mdash; Typ932 T  12:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I intend to remove more when I get a chance, though many do deserve to be mentioned (cars which are of disputed production status, or such and would hold the record were they actually production cars). Nasty (talk) 13:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Raw Engineering
A tag has been placed on Raw Engineering, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Raw Engineering
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 14:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Mondello Park image
I noticed that an image you originally uploaded back in 2007 is now on the commons as File:Striker on trackday.JPG. I wonder do you have any other images taken at [Mondello Park]] that could be used in that article. TIA ww2censor (talk) 14:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that's all I have Nasty (talk) 11:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh well. Thanks anyway. ww2censor (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Red Links
Red link which says "However, rather than using red links in lists, disambiguation pages or templates as an article creation guide, editors are encouraged to write the article first, and instead use wikiprojects or user spaces to keep track of unwritten articles." since they are in a list and as most have been there over two years, and there is no indication that any of them meet the WP:CORP inclusion guidelines I have removed them, feel free to add back when an article is written. Mt king  (edits)  22:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

List of Sports Cars
Please explain why you removed all of the Car's classes(Supercar, Roadster, and Sports Cars) Seqqis (Talk) 00:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I felt that this legend was not useful when the most appropriate info is in the table under the style field. Since all of the cars in this list should be sport cars, there is no need for that class (it is redundant). The body styles field can be used to give much more detailed information than just roadster or not and you will notice that I have preserved the appropriate info there. I think that the layout that had been in effect was not likely to scale properly to the length to which this list is destined to grow. If there is any way that you think you can improve the list and its usability, please feel free to make the appropriate changes. Nasty (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Car classification
You seem not to agree with my decision of replacing discontinued cars with cars currently in production. How about I separate historic cars from current cars. Example;

Example of historic City cars: Examples of modern city cars: As mixing the examples of historic and modern cars together doesn't seem right. Seqqis (talk) 05:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Austin 7
 * Fiat 126
 * Citroën LNA
 * Fiat Panda
 * Maruti 800
 * Mini


 * I generally feel that encyclopaedic articles should stand the test of time and include both currently relevant and historically important information, so I agree that your idea has merit. The only concern I have is that the current article is quite long and adding more examples than 3 will make it considerably longer. Feel free to make the change (I won't revert it or contest it), but I'd suggest that you discuss it on the talk page too. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this. Nasty (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raw Engineering


A tag has been placed on Raw Engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Technical 13 (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=607808891 your edit] to Skeena Middle School may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * merge

car classfication
Please don' t delete all my links and titles if you disagree with one part of my edits. I am trying to help list car types under the right titles. I can not edit all at once because i'm using a tablet and only explain my actions at the last edit.

Proposed deletion of Raw Engineering


The article Raw Engineering has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Neither this or the rebranded name of built.io have attracted sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet the notability of WP:NCORP"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 13:40, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Raw Engineering for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raw Engineering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raw Engineering until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)