User talk:Nasty1995

June 2021
Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, K Bye for Now (SWT Live), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ss  112   14:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Your recent editing history at Ariana Grande discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Don't revert editors without explanation
You were warned just above for being involved in edit warring. You've also been here for half a year. Do not revert editors without explanation, especially when the editor you're reverting provided an explanation for their removal. You've been reverted. Any reverts beyond this point will be considered disruptive, especially as I've now given a second explanation as to why, per WP:CHARTMATH and because the Gaon Digital international chart is a component of the main Gaon Digital chart, it is redundant. Thank you.  Ss  112   06:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)