User talk:NatWalter

August 2018
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your recent edits at Nicholas Walter are problematic for several reasons. I suggest that, in your own self-interest, you should follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle. That is, if you make an edit, and somebody else disagrees with it, do not simply repeat the edit. Instead, discuss the situation on the talk page. If that doesn't work, there are various avenues of dispute resolution available. Repeating the same edit over and over is known as edit-warring and is 100% ineffectual. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 20:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Your user name suggests that you may have a conflict of interest. If that's true, you are strongly discouraged from editing the article at all.
 * The informtion you are removing is cited, and you have not provided any citations to the contrary.
 * You have made no attempt to get consensus on the article's talk page.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nicholas Walter. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your behavior is making it more likely that this content will be retained. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2018 (UTC)