User talk:Nataliakills

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:NATALIAKILLS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NATALIAKILLS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 10:41, 13 February 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:41, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Natalia Kills, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Your contributions to the article are much appreciated, but your additions have little or no sources, even for things such as lawsuits etc. Please at least leave a link to the source. Cheers!'' Fixer23 (talk) 04:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

We don't do adverts
Hi - as you are more than likely aware, each time you change the Natalia Kills article, the changes are reverted. This is because your edits a) remove referenced facts and b) are promotional in nature. If you persist in trying to create a promotional article, it is likely that a) your account will be blocked and b) the article will be locked to new editors. Please contact me if you have any questions. --Cameron Scott (talk) 09:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username appears to be an impersonation of a living person (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

If you have been blocked for using your real name, please don't take offense; we're trying to prevent somebody from impersonating you! You are welcome to use your real name, but in some cases, you will need to prove you are who you say you are. You can do this by sending an e-mail to [mailto:info-en@wikimedia.org info-en@wikimedia.org]; be aware that the volunteer response team that handles e-mail is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and an immediate reply may not be possible.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)