User talk:Natalie Erin/Archive 5

Sock Puppet Issue
natalie erin, I would like to clear up this sock puppet issue. please email me so we can work this out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Samwisep86 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC).

I'd also like to clear up the sockpuppet issue, as I'm not a sockpuppet. Let me know what I can do. Thanks. RJ 22:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I will stipulate that it is not impossible that Samwisep86 misunderstood what he was doing such that he didn't realize that he wasn't making a mediation request, and Rjproie misunderstood that he was making a mediation request. In such context, Samwisep86's claim to have made a request demonstrably made by Rjproie would amount to a mistaken admission to being Rjproie, and later denial of having made the request would be smoke blown without the intention of blowing smoke. Further, it is not impossible that the inconsistencies of Samwisep86's later claims made in his defense were a product not of attempts to deceive but of panic and of more general sloppiness. —SlamDiego 00:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I was mad that such an accusation was made against myself, I can see how my replies to you SlamDiego made it seem inconsistent and illogical. Sometimes emotion overcomes logic as was the case here. I have spoken with User:Rjproie privately on how we can prove out innocence. Based on my preliminary assertion, we live at least a couple hundred miles away. I am aware of proxies and how they can be malicious, but I ultimately claimed in my post that I did not know how they worked, unknowingly. Samwisep86 01:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

hey
can u tell me how 2 put pictures on my wikipedia acount? --Oh yes it&#39;s me 12:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Your user page
Why don't you just semi-protect your userpage? It's obviously a target for anonymous vandalism and I don't think it's a good use of editors' time to watch your user page for easily-prevented vandalism. At this point, it's only giving the vandals the attention they crave. Deny them the attention they crave, please. --ElKevbo 22:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh - I just did that! Semi'd for a day, Natalie - hope you don't mind. Silly vandals ... - A l is o n  ☺ 22:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Help needed
As the only admin I know slightly, I'll ask you this. This guy stuck a vandal template on my page, presumably because it pointed the obvious fact that using an Actor infbox on John Simm, is better than a plain one. Anyway that's not important, the guy (User:Socialdemocrats) looks like a vandal, or at least some one who doesn't obey policy. Anyway, aside from reporting him, I just wanted to make sure someone of power knew about it, I have reverted the "warning", as I'm allowed to, primarily as it was clear it was vandilism. Anyway. Gran2 15:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi
I appreciate the block on 209.33.59.227, the IP's continuous vandalism was giving me a headache! --Ali 18:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the talk page revision it is greatly appreciated. -- St.daniel Talk 21:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Thx as well for your help. I had searched and searched for that page. Cheers Ian Idg555 21:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Spartan
I deleted this page at the request of the user. If I delete a page, it is usual to delete the associated userpage. I just checked the deletion log, and it still appears that the request to delete the user page came from the user; but if you have reason to assume that this is not so, I am perfectly happy to re-create the page. Let me know.--Anthony.bradbury 20:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I would appreciate a comment and closure of this issue; as it is, we have a deleted page and an existent talk page. I would really like either to delete the talk page or to re-create the user-page, if the user has changed his mind. Someone let me know?--Anthony.bradbury 21:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You and I are both admins: we do not fight, we co-operate. Do we delete the talk-page or re-create the user-page (against the request of the user)? Talk to me.--Anthony.bradbury 22:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

OK. I have to say that it still seems to me that if the user asks for his userpage to go, the talk-page should go to. But obviously I am not going to argue the point, and am content to take note that I was wrong. It's a learning experience.--Anthony.bradbury 15:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Cambodia and nameless vandals
Hey Natalie, this is a good opportunity to thank you for your sterling work on reverting vandalism on various Cambodia related articles. All on my watchlist, and all reverted by you before I got to them!

Our mutual friend (with the many IP's) actually has a point about Cambodian airports - there are not 16 airports in Cambodia. This guy (?) is definitely a local (Phnom Penh) and has even made some good corrections at times between being a complete *!#@$. However, there are also more than two airports - I'll track down the correct number, edit the section and reference it soon. Incidentally, this guys prose style seems familiar to me and Phnom Penh is a very small town - I wonder if i know him? Paxse 16:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think we've met but the online persona reminds me of someone I know from a Cambodia message board. As he's lurking and reverting my edits now too, I've noticed mostly two IP's, one Angkornet and one PPTV (sp?) - I'm thinking work and home computers. Perhaps Bangkok was a holiday (it's only a 50 min flight). Don't worry, I'll fix the airport info - and with a less abusive edit summary. Keep up the great work! Paxse 16:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

hehe
Oi, I am British!! Khu  kri  15:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

People against censorship
I have provided you with three links showing national media coverage of this group. DanielZimmerman 03:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Millard West High School
Can you semi-protect this page? Virtually every edit for the past few days has been vandalism of some sort, and the page should be fairly stable since the school year is finished, so there won't be a need for edits for the next few months. And anyone who wants to add useful information can just create an account :)

User:Rob Maguire

Mimeograph machine
Could you please warn, block, or otherwise take action against 206.213.209.31. This user placed a plagiarised paragraph from Richard Cox's blog in the mimeograph machine article on 10 May 2007. I've been in contact with Richard Cox. He wasn't happy about the plagiarism but was happy to have his words replaced with a summary and citation, which I've done.

history delete
Hi, can you please delete my user page history, it has personal information i don't want there. Thanks. User:poppy1989

Re: CSD AutoReason
They changed how the delete page was structured, so I had to make a minor change. Just reload the new script and you should be set. Also, if you'll add your name to the list of users, I can know to notify you on script updates. Regards, ^ demon [omg plz] 13:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

PanoTools Group
Thanks Natalie for your help and quick response !

John Spikowski 08:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Meggie Cleary
Hi Natalie, I left short semi-protect on it, so hopefully he'll lose interest and move on. Thanks &mdash;Moondyne 09:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

The revert.
Thanks for it. :) Acalamari 18:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought they'd gone as well, but it seems they're back with a vengeance. Now they've included Phaedriel in this as well. Never mind: it's just another day in the Wikipedian world. :) Acalamari 18:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Zelda Picture
Thanks, I knew about reverting, just diding know how to use it. Thanks for the links though! Emokin212

I nominated my article Tompkins Square Park Police Riot for FA status
From the nomination page: (self-nomination)This article is simply excellent. Excellent writing, interesting subject matter, improved during its Good Article trial, and eye-witnesses have left notes on the Talk page that talk about the article being so accurate, it's like they were living it all over again. Written in a NPOV and heavily cited with the highest of sources, it includes GFDL media, is wikified to the fullest, a fantastic "See Also" section, and looks at the story from every angle. --David Shankbone 18:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just letting people who I've conversed with in the past know in case they want to give their input for the nomination process.--David Shankbone 18:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Biodiesel
Yes, I removed content from the Biodiesel page because it was inappropriate. There was a table listing VW vehicles that can run on biodiesel. Since practically all diesel vehicles can run on biodiesel, singling out VW vehicles amounts to an advertisement for VW, which I'm sure we both agree to be an inappropriate use for Wikipedia. I also removed text from the article that referenced the table.

I appreciate your suggestion of including and edit summary to explain any changes I make.

User:Lunkhead
Hi Natalie, you have already warned this user to vandalize. Please have a look at this edit. thanks a lot. --Zinnmann 15:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)