User talk:Nataliep3/sandbox

Nataliep3's peer review by Laurenfeiman
Over all your additions to Fertility rate seem to help and give more incite in to the topic. All your sources work and appear to be relevant and to the point, the main thing I would suggest adding more recent data and a little bit more data points if you can find them. This would make the additions stronger and over all make the article more informative. If you can find it more information on approximately how many people are switching to the two child act and if the replacement level has a far way to go to be fixed. The additions where unbiased and over all important additions.Laurenfeiman (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the helpful review. I have been trying to find more recent data from a trusted author, but most of what I find is about the marriage squeeze. Perhaps I should add to that part of this article as well. Nataliep3 (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Nataliep3's peer review by yvettetiff
I liked your focus on how the fertility rate has fallen due to this implementation of a one-child policy. I think it could be beneficial to mention how the continuously low rate could affect the future populations to come. Possibly mention how the number of females will stay constantly low unless the fertility rate increases and how that would impact the country. Have you been able to confirm the info on men being unable to start a family? If not, is there another fact/statistic you could discuss instead? I think your resources and contributions are off to a great start and could just use some expansion. Yvettetiff (talk) 04:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer review response
Over all I think the additions you have made will greatly improve the original Wikipedia. I still would like to know how many family's changed and how fast to change to the two child family's and how fast it was excepted as a normal family type. Your additions are well thought out and will help the article.Laurenfeiman (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)