User talk:Natascha1

Hello, I had putted our scholarly website links for astrology, horoscope and Yagya section which has been rudely deleted. The websites are very appropriate with the topic and I didn’t find it gentle deleting my works without asking any clarification. I see that you have more external links in the same contents whi9ch are not by the professionals or learned scholars. I would like to know about your tendencies that make you not justifying. I also would like to know if I am in mandate to make donation to prevent any deletion of links. Can you please give me 1 reason why my links are deleted and other 4 links are not. I have gone through your suggested pages/ rules and according to those pages it was neither in-appropriate, nor spam.

Please let me know! Thank you Natascha

The page Bhrigumantra Mahayagya is up for deletion right now because it does not contain a lot of useful information. You're welcome to help improve it, but please keep in mind comments and discussion on the article should be placed on the article's talk page. If you continue to place them in the article itself, they will continue to be removed and you may be blocked from editing. Please take a look at our help pages for more information on how to write a good article. Welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you continue to help. Hersfold (talk 17:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Hindu/Comments
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Hindu/Comments, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Hindu/Comments is a test page. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Hindu/Comments, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Vedbhawan
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vedbhawan, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

D. B. Pathak
Another editor has added the " " template to the article D. B. Pathak, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)