User talk:Natashakhardina

Welcome
Hello, Natashakhardina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you have edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Empty Buffer (talk) 22:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Conflict of interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Heiko bleher, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 22:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Heiko Bleher
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Heiko Bleher, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.aquapress-bleher.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1&Itemid=49. As a copyright violation, Heiko Bleher appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Heiko Bleher has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Heiko Bleher and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Heiko Bleher with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Heiko Bleher.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. 91.49.77.87 (talk) 21:07, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: AQUA, International Journal of Ichthyology (November 9) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * User:Natashakhardina/sandbox/AQUA, International Journal of Ichthyology may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Natashakhardina Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikiisawesome&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Natashakhardina reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia  /tlk  23:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aqua, international Journal of ichthyology


A tag has been placed on Aqua, international Journal of ichthyology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 16:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Natashakhardina. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Aqua, international Journal of ichthyology, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 16:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Heiko Bleher


A tag has been placed on Heiko Bleher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 16:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:AQUA, International Journal of Ichthyology


A tag has been placed on Draft:AQUA, International Journal of Ichthyology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Heiko Bleher


A tag has been placed on Heiko Bleher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with editing of this article as I do not see where is the advert or promotion material in it. I have checked the similar articles on WIKIPEDIA on people from the similar fields like Takashi Amano, Hans Albrecht Baensch or Herbert Axelrod (all 3 are also publishers) for example. All have mentioned their companies, publications and even product lines like Takashi. To my understanding, I tryed to mention the facts that made Bleher to what he is – great explorer, adventurer and writer.

Natashakhardina (talk) 21:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Natasha Khardina
 * It's not blatantly promotional but could simply use more sources particularly in-depth third-party. If you want, this can be drafted and userfied to User:Natashakhardina/Sandbox. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  22:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * From the sources it would appear that you are personally involved with Bleher (colleague, partner, or even husband?) That doesn't make it easy for you to be neutral. For instance, you wrote in the article that he's a "leading expert" and then you give one of his own publications as source for that. Certainly you can see that a claim like that needs an reliable source independent of the subject himself. As for the other articles you mention, please read WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. (Although I checked Herbert Axelrod and was surprised to see a rather balanced article, given that guy's penchant for self-aggrandisement -just look up Nijssen and Isbrücker's original description of Corydoras narcissus or the original descriptions of Rasbora axelrodi and Rasbora brittani...). The article on Amano is not very good, I couldn't find any article on Baensch (except for a stub in the German WP). Anyway, you're really not the right person to write a bio on Bleher. Bleher meets our inclusion criteria (even though I don't give a dime for the species named after him by Rataj, probably the most inept systematic botanist I ever heard of), so eventually somebody will write an article on him. --Randykitty (talk) 12:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)