User talk:Nate623

Recent edit to Kaylee Hartung
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 21:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm Deadbeef. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kaylee Hartung— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 06:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kaylee Hartung with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 21:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kaylee Hartung. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Euryalus (talk) 09:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * See also User:Nd23108 - Euryalus (talk) 09:29, 31 December 2014 (UTC)