User talk:NateAlma13

Welcome!
Hello, NateAlma13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 20:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fernando Canon has been accepted
 Fernando Canon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Fernando_Canon help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Fernando Canon
Please see talk page. Stop removing legitimate tags until all problems are addressed.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Fernando Canon, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - NEVER remove another editor's comments on a talk page. Onel 5969  TT me 17:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fernando Canon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - At this point, you're continued removal of legitimate tags without the necessary corrections is simply disruptive editing. It should stop, or you could get blocked from editing. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello. All the information given at Fernando Canon were based on facts and almost all the information were backed by the references, the few remaining information that are not backed by the references were firsthand information obtained directly from the family of Fernando Canon. Nevertheless, the writer maintained an objective approach in writing this article, it cannot be denied that the heavily valuable contribution of the subject to his country and the greatness of Fernando Canon when he was living as detailed by the writer to the words of this article made the article look unrightly subjective, but if one will read the references, including some that are written in Filipino (which is suggested to be translated), the person will see and understand that the information and credence given to the words of this article: Fernando Canon, are right and accurate. Regarding the references, I made some improvements in the footnotes, I am not extremely well versed in foot noting, you can suggest me the better way. If you wish to edit the article for improvement, go ahead. Thank you and pardon for the misunderstanding.


 * Firsthand information is not allowed on WP. Please see WP:OR.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fernando Canon, you may be blocked from editing. - please stop your disruptive editing. Leave tags in place and discuss on talk page.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

All firsthand information in this article were removed. Disruptive editing behavior was already halted following the first apprehension. I logically suggest the removal of the multiple issues tag in this page, because all the issues has been addressed and consequently fixed, it is deemed to be unjust if the tags will remain despite the solution of the issues.

→ You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did  at Fernando Canon. - The issues have hardly been resolved, as was pointed out the last time I added them. Your continued disruptive editing, without discussing it on the talk page as per WP:BRD, has you in danger of getting blocked. You are exhibiting WP:OWN tendencies, which is not the way WP works. That article still needs quite a bit of work. Onel 5969  TT me 12:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Alright mate, here we go. The three enumerated issues of this article are: Neutrality of the way this article was written, insufficient citations or permissible sources, and lastly the article contains wordings that promote the subject in subjective manner without imparting real information. First is neutrality, I wrote this article profoundly based on the information extracted from the cited references which you can see below of this article, it is natural that the greatness of the late subject as presented by the credible sources enumerated below (kindly see the links of the sources please) and the wordy construction of the writer of this article may create an impression that this article was subjectively written, but it is easily understandable because Fernando Canon was one of the notable persons in Philippine history thus; the subject significantly contributed to the realization of the Philippine independence and was also credited to the technological advancement of the Philippines at the time before the Philippine-American war. Second, the writer of this article provided "5" credible sources for writing this article, you deem that insufficient and non-credible, please kindly go ahead and check. Third and last enumerated issue, the article contains wordings that promote the subject in subjective manner without imparting real information; the subject of this article Fernando Canon was descriptively written in the spirits of the information extracted from the credible sources cited by the writer of this article, "not imparting real information," really bro? Kindly google Fernando Canon so you can see what was he or just simply click the sources cited in this article, either way you will acquire same results. In short and simply, he was what he was written in this article, that is because he was a Filipino hero who significantly contributed to his country's attainment of freedom firstly from Spain, then from the Americans, the subject held significant roles in two Philippine Revolutions; the subject aside from being a revolutionary general was also an inventor (kindly see the bottom most part of the article to see his creative and highly functional inventions), scientist, Philippine Chess champion, writer, and the first secretary of the University of the Philippines Conservatory of Music; you can go check the references I cited below this article for verification, but what can we do? The man was just a great person, really great person far from the ordinaries that when I wrote this article about him it sounded subjective whereas I am just being descriptive relying solely on the cited references I provided (PS, this article was almost backed with the cited sources with very few information approximately amounting to 5% being firsthand information which were sourced directly from his granddaughter, but as you stated firsthand information are not permissible, so I deleted them!). The flagging statement above was deleted by the writer of this article because upon reading the rules in the removal of those type of tags, the writer discovered that upon the solution of the enumerated issues the tags will not be automatically removed thus the writer remove those tags as they were already deemed to be unnecessary because those enumerated issues don't exist anymore. I can make this article much longer by expanding each of his contribution to the Philippines, but I was trained to write short but concise, so that is what I did. I am just giving the great but long ago dead man his due in my little way, your little aid may greatly help. Thank you.