User talk:NateTC

Speedy deletion nomination of The Murder of Crows


A tag has been placed on The Murder of Crows, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. EmadIV (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at The Murder of Crows
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Murder of Crows. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at The Murder of Crows, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

===Status and Advice===

As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. You said on the now deleted talk that you were not finished--but then you said that the web site wasn't finished either. I consequently deleted it for both promotionalism and no indication of importance.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia  is for things that are already important, that people will know about already, and come here to look for information about. When your band has reached that degree of importance that there are references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, then someone not connected with it will come and write the article. Number of views of a website is not considered here proof of notability. See Notability (web) for a full explanation of what does count.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.  DGG ( talk ) 18:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)