User talk:Nate Winchester

October 2015
Hello, I'm Cannolis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Maine Mendoza— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cannolis (talk) 12:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Cannolis (talk) 12:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alden Richards, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Alden Richards was changed by Nate Winchester (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963552 on 2015-10-18T12:35:37+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Curtis. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Anne Curtis was changed by Nate Winchester (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941561 on 2015-10-18T12:41:09+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 14:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KhenyDependence


A tag has been placed on KhenyDependence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)