User talk:Nath205

July 2015
Hello, I'm Mr Potto. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Royal Life Saving Society UK seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia articles should not be written in the same way as marketing materials or brochures promoting organizations, and should stick to concise facts with no editorializing or judgmental comments. Mr Potto (talk) 09:35, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Royal Life Saving Society UK. If you do that one more time, you will be reported to the appropriate administrator's noticeboard and you could end up being blocked from editing. If there is genuinely some out of date information then please just update that - but do not restore it article to that horrible promotional puff piece. Mr Potto (talk) 10:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, and now that your changes have been challenged and reverted, please stop reinserting them and start talking on the article Talk page. See WP:BRD which explains the need to discuss contested changes and seek consensus. You made the Bold changes (the B) part, I reverted them with an explanation why (the R), so now you need to move on to the D part and discuss it. Mr Potto (talk) 10:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, please have a read of WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK. Mr Potto (talk) 10:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Further checking shows that at least some of the material you have been adding was copied directly from the organization's own website, (eg from http://www.rlss.org.uk/about-us/our-organisation/), and that was a copyright violation (see WP:COPYVIO). Even if it wasn't prohibited by Wikipedia's copyright policy, the way an organization writes about itself is almost always entirely wrong for inclusion in an encyclopedia article. But as a further thought, if you would like to explain what is out of date in the article as it stands and suggest some improvements on the talk page (at Talk:Royal Life Saving Society UK), I'll be happy to try to make the changes for you in a style that is more fitting for an encyclopedia. Mr Potto (talk) 11:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, As you can probably tell I'm quite new to this. Sorry for causing any trouble. I'm just wanting to add a few updates to the page. If you could help me that would be appreciated. I'm not trying to market anything through this page, just inform people about the society. If I give you some relevant facts will you be able to add them in for me? Thank you very much