User talk:Nathalie Wik

 <div style="background-color: Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.  Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)   Hello, Nathalie Wik, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting started
 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Finding your way around
 * Table of contents
 * Directories and indexes
 * Department directory
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Editing articles
 * How to develop an article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting help
 * Frequently asked questions
 * Cheatsheet
 * Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
 * The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
 * Help pages
 * Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How you can help
 * Community Portal
 * Join a WikiProject
 * Follow Wikipedia etiquette
 * Practice civility
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nathalie Wik/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Nathalie_Wik/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Nathalie_Wik/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Tamimiii.webp
Thanks for uploading File:Tamimiii.webp. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Hamad Hassan Al Tamimi moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Hamad Hassan Al Tamimi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and too much of the content is unreferenced, per WP:BLP. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamad Hassan Al Tamimi (August 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamad Hassan Al Tamimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Hamad_Hassan_Al_Tamimi Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hamad_Hassan_Al_Tamimi reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello Nathalie Wik. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Hamad Hassan Al Tamimi, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nathalie Wik. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Doublegrazing, I understand your point of view, but I am not sure if the speedy deletion was needed, it is something I have been working on for some time now, with zero financial benefit. I am not sure how you want me to prove that. I live in a country that I think I want to give back to and to a writer who has done a lot of work, that I wanted to highlight. I wanted to gain experience little by little of wikipedia, but I believe people like you contribute to a lesser contribution to this community. You have deleted a hard work I have done, that I can't redo again and I do not appreciate at all this. 37.211.151.149 (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Firstly, if you are User:Nathalie Wik, please log into your account when editing.
 * Secondly, if, as you say, you do not stand to benefit financially from writing about this topic, then that is great, and you don't need to 'prove' it further. Incidentally, what is your relationship with the subject, if not financial?
 * Thirdly, I did not delete your draft; I couldn't, if I wanted to, as I'm not an administrator. What I did was suggest that it should be deleted. An admin then came along and looked at it, agreed with the suggestion, and deleted it. (This was done because the draft was purely promotional, and promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia.) If you have an issue with that, you need to take it up with the deleting admin.
 * Finally, I don't know what you mean by "people like you" – people like who? And why do you feel qualified, or see it necessary, to talk down other editors' "contribution to this community"? Please bear in mind that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and personal attacks and accusations are hardly conducive to collaboration. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I found it harsh and felt under attack, when you sent all these messages. It very clear that I am a new user, and while I may have made a mistake, a suggestion would have been appreciated. I know what wikipedia is about and I respect the mission, that I tried to contribute to. But I would have provided the help and definitely not recommended deletion without at least waiting for a reply. Nathalie Wik (talk) 09:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hamad Hassan Al Tamimi


A tag has been placed on Draft:Hamad Hassan Al Tamimi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)