User talk:NathanDeRidder

Hello. I understand this must be a frustrating experience, but I would kindly suggest you take some time to read up on the way Wikipedia works, starting with WP:PROMOTION and WP:NEUTRAL, before attempting to contribute further to the Ponte City article. Your edits in their current form are highly unlikely to be accepted. Argymeg (talk) 00:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking the time to provide a reason for the reverted changes. I have removed the website link and instead explained why the new website is important to the business. I am working alongside the owners of Ponte and we are trying to focus on the posetives of Ponte as appose to the negatives of the buildings past. NathanDeRidder (talk) 05:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I still reverted your last changes. Phrases like "Ponte City dominates the Johannesburg skyline." and "It remains a focal point of the city’s dreams, a lightning rod for a society’s hopes, and always a beacon to navigate by. " do not belong in encyclopedia. You also rearranged the article and put large parts in the header, there is no need to and it creates a mess. As instructed above you should take your time and read WP:PROMOTION and WP:NEUTRAL
 * There is a talk page in the article, I suggest you put your proposed edits there before changing the article. Lukaszsw (talk) 11:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)