User talk:Nathan Babik

May 2021
Hello, I'm Finneus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to North have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Finn! (talk) 20:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jackson, Queensland. Ifnord (talk) 21:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 21:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

I was trying to add constructive info to 2048

{unblock|Theres no way that you can 100% trust anyone and I wont do that ever do it again and I really need this for school. If you see me doing it again then you can delete my account. Nathan Babik (talk) 18:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)}

No no. None of your edits were constructive, we know that already. Please give an example of a future edit you'd make, if you were unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

You now have three (!!!) open unblock requests. This is abusive. One at a time, please; remove all but one open unblock request, leaving the declined unblock requests in place. You also have yet to demonstrate an exact productive edit you'd make, and this is substantially counting against you. And, I'm sorry to say, the block on your whole school is your own fault. If other editors (constructive editors) are affected, they are free to request the block on them is lifted. --Yamla (talk) 21:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Are yu serious this is what your life has come to just let me have my account

You do know that youve banned so many people that have worked rly hard on their wikipeadia then u just ban them for saying one thing

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.