User talk:Nathan Giles

Ashley Young
Sorry I didn't respond to your message earlier...I went to lunch before I saw it was there. I rejected the edit because I thought it looked like you had put it in the article at a random location....and, if his diving is a significant issue, I'm surprised that it's not mentioned somewhere already. If it isn't then: a.) find a place where it fits in with the subject being discussed and, b.) attach one of those websites from Google as a reference. Of course, I can't promise that some other reviewer won't reject it for some other reason.

Don't be discouraged...when I started editing, half my edits were rejected or corrected.WQUlrich (talk) 22:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I did put my source in and it does pertain to his Manchester united career. I wonder if it would be better to start a new heading ? something like controversy?I could put this result from Google in but INathan Giles (talk) 22:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC) guess it would change if say ,he scored a goal or got married .My citation was from the BBC website but I can get others from the telegraph newspaper or ESPN which in your opinion would be best


 * Give it a try: I just noticed that your edit was rejected again by someone named "HonorTheKing", and he didn't give a reason.WQUlrich (talk) 23:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

i have added a heading controversy see if it stays up this time 12:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Nathan Giles (talk)
 * Youtube isn't a valid source, and you really shouldn't undo a whole load of formatting edits into the bargain. – PeeJay 22:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Use a news source, Youtube isn't valid. – PeeJay 22:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, although I'd prefer it if you used the BBC or The Guardian. Also, the section will need rewriting so that it's not just a single, one-sentence paragraph about Ferguson and Moyes having a word with him. Why not add info about the actual times when he's been found to have dived? Go the whole hog. Oh, and I probably wouldn't add it as a separate section. – PeeJay 22:50, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, you could use any of those. I'd steer clear of the manutd.com one though, as I think it's a little too close to the situation. – PeeJay 23:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)