User talk:Nathan marcellus moore

Hello!
Hello, Nathan marcellus moore. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Jayron  32  15:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Article on Nathan Moore
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed your recent edit to Nathan_Moore_(English_musician). Please see the "Talk" page for the article, where I explain why I have reverted your recent deletion of the information that at the time of his trial Moore claimed to have been in a gay relationship for 13 years. Please feel free to contact me either there or directly if you wish to discuss this further. RomanSpa (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've had to revert a further edit you made, and have made a further comment on Talk:Nathan_Moore_(English_musician) (the "Talk" page for the article). Please could we discuss this there? It's not very helpful to keep deleting sentences that have been added in good faith. Thanks in advance. RomanSpa (talk) 00:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Request
Hi. I notice that you have once again removed information from the article on Nathan_Moore_(English_musician). I understand that you may not like that the information is in the article, but it was well-reported at the time in multiple sources. If you are (as you claim to be) Nathan Moore, I can understand that you might well wish to gloss over this part of your life, but my understanding is that Wikipedia's articles aren't simply a sort of image-management tool. We have to report the less-pleasant stuff as well as the more-pleasant stuff, because that's what an encyclopedia does. Perhaps you could contact me, and we could discuss this, so that we can sort this out? I'll make a point of checking in here and on my own "Talk" page over the next few days. If I haven't heard from you in a few days, though, I'll go ahead and revert your recent edit, as I don't think it's fair to remove verifiable information from Wikipedia simply for what seem to be image-management reasons.

I really hope you'll get in touch. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I've been looking around for some stuff that might help you to understand my concerns about your editing, and how we can work together more helpfully. You might find this page interesting and useful: The plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Hope to hear from you in the next few days. RomanSpa (talk) 23:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I have now reverted your recent edit. Please feel free to get in touch if you want to discuss this. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Please Get In Touch :-)
Hi. I see we're still having problems over how to present the information that at the time of his trial for kerb-crawling, it was claimed that Nathan Moore had been in a gay relationship for several preceding years. It's not very helpful for you to keep deleting this, and I do feel it was not entirely frank to label your most recent edit of the page as "minor", when it deleted this significant point. I hope you'll feel able to get in touch with me, so that we can resolve this. As an alternative option, how would you feel about seeking a "third party" to help us with this?

Please feel free to get in touch. I do understand (from your choice of username) that you do have a strong personal interest in this subject, but I hope we can work together to sort this out. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 22:52, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, I know that every user/editor has different standards for what they think counts as a "minor" edit, so I thought I'd mention mine... I try to only label my edits as minor if they are something like: I generally try not to label something as a minor edit if it adds, deletes, re-interprets or otherwise changes the sense of an article. I hope this is of some use. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * correcting spelling
 * correcting punctuation
 * small adjustments to the flow of sentences, so long as the meaning is left unchanged
 * correction of manifest errors (doubled words, for example)
 * small changes to article layouts

Just to Let You Know...
Hi. I've been hoping you would get in touch with me to discuss your continual deletions of documented matters of fact from Nathan_Moore_(English_musician). I wanted to let you know that I have been looking into finding a solution to this issue, and will probably try to seek some comments and guidance from some other editors in the next few days. I don't really want to do this, but I am starting to feel that if we can't discuss this directly it will probably be necessary. I really hope you'll get in touch, so that we can sort this out without bothering anyone else.

Looking forward to hearing from you. RomanSpa (talk) 00:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)