User talk:Nathanbennett

September 2013
Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Arnold Rimmer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 11:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kristine Kochanski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Materialscientist (talk) 12:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:AN/I discussion notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 00:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Nathanbennett
User:Nathanbennett, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nathanbennett and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Nathanbennett during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Auric   talk  00:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Barrie, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 12:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Chris Barrie
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chris Barrie. Petrb (talk) 12:07, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia. All of your editing has been either outright vandalism or else use of your userspace to play around. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)