User talk:Nathanf10

Penfield railway line, adelaide
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Penfield railway line, adelaide, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.freebase.com/view/en/penfield_railway_line_adelaide.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism? - warning
Are ANY of your edits productive, or even vaguely useful? If you think so, please provide some explanations and justifications. If, however, (as I suspect), they are not, you are hereby warned that your edits are vandalism, and that repeated vandalism DOES lead to people being prevented from editing wikipedia. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * 22:38, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Penfield railway line, adelaide ‎ (Tag: copyright violation template removed)
 * 22:34, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) N Penfield railway line, adelaide ‎ (←Created page with 'Penfield railway line, Adelaide From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search Penfield railway line is a defunct railway in northern Adelaide ...') (Tag: large unwikified new article)
 * 22:31, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Template:Adelaide railway lines ‎
 * 22:29, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Template:Adelaide railway lines ‎
 * 22:27, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Template:Adelaide railway lines ‎
 * 22:16, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Belair railway line, Adelaide ‎ (→Resleepering) (Tag: section blanking)
 * 21:42, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Template:Adelaide railway lines ‎
 * 21:39, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Adelaide Railway Station ‎ (top) [rollback]
 * 21:38, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Adelaide Railway Station ‎
 * 21:36, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Template:Adelaide railway lines ‎
 * 21:36, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Template:Adelaide railway lines ‎
 * 21:35, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) Template:Adelaide railway lines ‎
 * 21:31, 8 November 2010 (diff | hist) N Seaford railway line, Adelaide ‎ (←Created page with 'Seaford centre railway line The seaford centre railway line is a suburban commuter line in the city of Adelaide, South Australia. Noarlunga Centre Line. Railways in...') (Tag: large unwikified new article)

Context
I have moved Grand junction station to User:Nathanf10/sandbox. Did it cross your mind that it might be an idea to state what country the station is in? Do not move it back into the (article) namespace until it is a properly referenced article. &mdash; RHaworth 13:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bus stop V1 king william street


A tag has been placed on Bus stop V1 king william street requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 13:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seaford Meadows railway station


A tag has been placed on Seaford Meadows railway station, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 11:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Salisbury railway station, Adelaide with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salisbury_railway_station,_Adelaide&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Trusilver 02:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seaford Meadows railway station
Hello, Nathanf10, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Seaford Meadows railway station, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)