User talk:Nathanfk13

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: &#39;&#39;Have A Nice Day&#39;&#39; 00:45, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

deletion review
hi nathan; please see WP:DRV if you'd like to recreate the Switchtrack Alley article. When something has been deleted, you can't just go ahead and repost it. . . sorry. --He:ah? 06:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and if it makes it through drv, you don't have to rewrite it, it can just be restored. --He:ah? 06:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 16:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Switchtrack Alley
If this is a home-made film with no legit studio backing it, it's very very unlikely that the article would be kept. I'd advise you not to waste your time. We get articles all the time on homemade films and music, and we pretty much delete them all. Basically, coverage in reliable sources for purposes of verifiability is the absolute minimum requirement for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Friday (talk) 19:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

re: Requests for content review
I see now. I misread the comment down in the longer discussion. Nevertheless, I would disagree with the advice you were given and that think the requests are better kept together. In the recent past, we've had people open multiple requests in an attempt to forum-shop and to circumvent the emerging consensus. I'm afraid that the presumption these days is that such multiple requests are automatically suspicious. I think you did the right thing with your explicit request in the main discussion below. My apologies for not fully assuming good faith. Rossami (talk) 20:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)