User talk:Nathanholder

Welcome!

 * }

COI
I'll respect your flag and not tag your article for deletion just yet. But please read WP:COI: it's generally not OK to write an article about oneself. If you're notable enough for a wikipedia article, somebody else will write it. PhGustaf (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Nathan holder had no meaningful content at all. Although it is a mistake to create a "placeholder" article to be filled in later, rather than wait until you have some material to put in the article, I would have been willing to wait for a while, as PhGustaf clearly was. However, after more than eighteen hours you had had time to start editing, and since you hadn't the article has been deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jefferson Davis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. This edit was totally unconstructive. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mount Airy, North Carolina, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I note also your edits to Lock (device), John Locke (Lost) Warcraft, which were unambiguous vandalism. Please do not continue in this way. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)