User talk:Nathanielpalmer

License tagging for Image:Processmodel large.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Processmodel large.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Spam in Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of Workflow
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of Workflow, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of Workflow is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of Workflow, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of Workflow itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of Workflow
I have added a "" template to the article Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of Workflow, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Whsitchy 23:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Category:Business Process Management
I note you have created this new category without reference to the existing Category:Process management. You may also wish to look at the Category:Workflow technology. I suggest you may wish to merge your categories into these. --RichardVeryard 12:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Black Forest Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Forest Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Black Forest Group & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   09:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)