User talk:NathyWashington

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are obviously editing against both consensus and policy; the links involved were independently removed last week by a different editor, and no other editor has supported your position in the discussions you initiated. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no connection to this site therefore it cannot be spamming. I will continue to add sources I think are relevant. This is not Hullaballoopedia it's Wikipedia and I will contribute to it as I see fit. Stop being petty. If you continue to act in this manor and refuse to contribute to the discussion I will report you to Wikipedia. NathyWashington (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Enough! Three users have objected to your mass inclusion of awmb: Hullaboo TabercilNymf Let me be the fourth. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to be bullied out of it by people who aren't willing to have a rational discussion or offer alternative sources. I will be more than happy to report people, even well known editors if I feel I'm trying to be bullied about my edits rather than having a rational discussion about them. I've heard about the "Wikipedia Nazi's" but I won't be bullied as I'm the type of person that prefers a rational discussion to see alternatives. NathyWashington (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're in danger of being blocked due to this multi-article edit war. The editor who adds material to an article has the burden of proof that it complies with wikipedia policy. If you wish to have a discussion over at the project page, then go ahead and do so but do not reinstate these links without a consensus to do so. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That is why I stopped reverting because I don't want an "undo/edit war" I asked him to contribute to the discussion and he wouldn't even entertain the idea. I tried to discuss it with him but he seems unwilling to do so. I will not undo further because I don't want a petty edit war, that is not my intention. To be honest I think it's his rather childish disregard for a discussion that caused me to do it before I realised it's not worth it, going by his talk page he seems to have a "what I says goes" attitude with refusal to discuss. NathyWashington (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Beloved Freak  16:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)