User talk:Natron25

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Entropy, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian Cairns (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Excitement, Adventure, and Really Wild Things


The article Excitement, Adventure, and Really Wild Things has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable fanfiction

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  role player 21:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Excitement, Adventure, and Really Wild Things


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Excitement, Adventure, and Really Wild Things, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. → Σ  τ  c. 21:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Two-Thousand Year Man


The article The Two-Thousand Year Man has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable character in a Non-notable book (that's not published), by a Non-notable author.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  21:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Two-Thousand Year Man for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Two-Thousand Year Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Two-Thousand Year Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   23:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Casa de Comedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. No more articles on your unpublished books, comics, or characters. Please see WP:MADEUP. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gutsy Smurf


A tag has been placed on Gutsy Smurf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zad68 (talk) 18:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Virginia Stanton Biddlecomb


A tag has been placed on Virginia Stanton Biddlecomb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Androids101 &#124; Visit me!  &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs   23:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Revolution at Sea Saga for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolution at Sea Saga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Revolution at Sea Saga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 01:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation Pages
Thank you for your contributions. When making disambiguations please remember to  add the  template to  disambiguation  pages. For more information please see WP:DAB and revisit and update any  dab pages you recently  created. Thank you. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of By Force of Arms for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article By Force of Arms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/By Force of Arms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 01:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

advice
I'm interested in articles on fiction, and experienced in deletion process here, and I am going to try to rescue as much of this as possible, because I think the series does meet our requirements for inclusion.

But please proceed more slowly and carefully: no not make articles for individual characters unless you have good third party sources discussing those characters in particular, which will not be very common. Otherwise, include them in the article in the book or the series, or, at the most, a list of characters.

But for a book, the article too will only stand here if there are sources--the criteria are at WP:NBOOK. What normally meets the criteria is book reviews, or, alternatively prizes. You can usually get a few such reviews from google News, and any librarian can help you find others. If you can not find these sources, it is a very good idea just to start with the article on the author, wait until it is accepted for a while,

When you do write about a book, you need to include more than the plot: you need to talk about when it was published, and what the critical reception was. Again,a librarian can help you. And please remember never to take plot or character information from any previously published source, such as the author's web pages or Amazon--articles where that is done will always be rapidly deleted.

For this particular series, please don't add any more articles until we have dealt with the ones you have already written. What you should do instead, is add information and references.  DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachel Jade


A tag has been placed on Rachel Jade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. M2Ys4U ( talk ) 03:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Minor characters in the Revolution at Sea Saga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Nathaniel Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Norse, Tintin and Jotun


 * Alice Chesley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tintin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathaniel Nelson


A tag has been placed on Nathaniel Nelson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Malcolma (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathaniel Nelson


A tag has been placed on Nathaniel Nelson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Callanecc (alt) (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Nathaniel Nelson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Callanecc (alt) (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minor characters in the Revolution at Sea Saga, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ferrier and John Biddlecomb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rachel Jade


The article Rachel Jade has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable book character; I cannot find multiple reliable sources significantly discussing the character or the book she appears in.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  03:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moriah Blake, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Olympia and Principal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Moriah Blake


A tag has been placed on Moriah Blake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sideways713 (talk) 13:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Erogrendel (novel)


The article Erogrendel (novel) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * A self-published book released two days ago.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 04:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Erogrendel (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erogrendel (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Erogrendel (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Natron25. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like you've been trying to add yourself to Wikipedia since 2012. (I've found evidence to suggest that you are the author himself.) Please stop. This is seen as self-promotion and it's not kosher on here, especially since the prior deletions would have given you enough information to where you should be aware of what is needed to pass NBOOK. The guidelines haven't changed that much since 2012 and the sources you're using in your articles do not show notability. Right now the only reason you're not permanently blocked as a promotional account is because you've made edits on other articles, but I am debating whether or not to give you a short block since you've already had enough warning to know that, at the very least, that you shouldn't be making articles of this nature, as there's not only a COI that you haven't divulged but the pages still do not establish notability. Wikipedia is not a place to spread awareness of your work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, understand that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by any association with a notable writer. Since has only edited pages concerning this author, I have to assume that they were someone you asked to come and edit with you. They need to divulge their COI as well. I'm going to give you a short block because you've already had enough prior warning that these topics would not pass notability guidelines and at this point it does seem like it's being done to promote yourself on Wikipedia. Bringing someone else on to edit with you doesn't really make things look much better, honestly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for self-promotion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Initially I was only going to make this temporary, but the more I thought about it the more I felt that this should be an indefinite time period. You've tried to make articles for yourself and your work since 2012. You've made some edits to other articles, but by large the bulk of your edits seem to be to add yourself to Wikipedia or to edit about things/people you're affiliated with. You've already had warning in the past, on multiple occasions, about what was needed for notability on here. That you've been editing since 2012 and never saw fit to be transparent about any COI makes everything that much worse. Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself and it's inappropriate to try to get someone else to come and make an article on your behalf. Please do not try to add yourself (or get anyone else to) again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Minor characters in the Revolution at Sea Saga for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minor characters in the Revolution at Sea Saga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Minor characters in the Revolution at Sea Saga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta (talk) 19:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Biddlecomb


A tag has been placed on John Biddlecomb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)