User talk:Natsanabria

Welcome!
Hello, Natsanabria, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!
You tha goat!

Mr.Ek0 (talk) 16:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 

Peer-Review -- Suggestions
I really enjoyed reading the information you added to the Martha article. You were quite detailed in your paragraphs. I would, however, advise revising the content of your sections. For example, while the first and last paragraph of the “Works” section indeed discusses Martha’s works, you may want to check with your partner to see if the other paragraphs could be assigned a different section since they seem to address Martha’s social activism more than her works.

Mortrick (talk) 23:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review
You did a great job putting Martha Gruening’s article together. The lead is clear and concise and previews the rest of the article. The content you added created a well-rounded view of Gruenning’s life, especially the things added about education, and notable works. The only thing I noticed is in the works section there are some words used like “brilliantly” “warmly” and “storm of” that can be seen as bias or embellishments which aren’t necessary to the article. The next thing I noticed was that the article is missing a legacy section that provides info on her passing and how she impacted her community or family. It’s awesome that you were able to find a photo of the Gomez Mill House and the story behind the house that added more insight into Gruenning’s personal life which made your article well rounded. The overall tone of the article was neutral but in the works section, there are some imbalances in neutrality. The sources are solid and directly from the publication which is awesome, and the article is well organized. Overall the article was clear and informative with strong details on Martha Gruenning’s life, childhood, adulthood, and story. Good luck with the rest of your article!

Leoyssanel13 (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi There! All in all, you all have made great progress on improving both the flow and the structure of the Martha Gruenig article. The additional sources will come in handy for adding additional context to the article, and the edits made to improve the overall flow and understanding of the article. In particular, adding the works page was a genuine improvement over the previous iteration of the article. focusing on her contributions to the world of poetry and literature. I would consider using the sources to even further the analysis! More edits could be made to her personal information and biography sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackGolio (talk • contribs) 01:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)