User talk:Natsume96

March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Solid Snake has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Solid Snake was changed by Natsume96 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876925 on 2014-03-07T18:46:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Oli White. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Zpeopleheart (talk) 09:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Speculative content
Hi, please don't add speculative content as you did here at Winx Club. Wikipedia is not interested in our personal analyses or opinions, only the analyses of reliable published sources. Please see WP:OR. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sailor Moon video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doomsday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MSE-logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:MSE-logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:86.136.129.122. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Those IP edits were not vandalism and shouldn't be labeled as such either with edit summary assertions and warning messages. If you disagree with the IPs edits, revert giving a reason you disagree with their given reason. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You've continued to improperly impose threatening block messages upon users who make changes which go against your questionable edits, against the suggestion of Geraldo Perez. I strongly suggest that you cease doing this when your current block expires; it's not likely such behavior will be tolerated indefinitely. Vague | Rant 11:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Metrostar Rattler deletion
The discussion can only be closed after 7 days have elapsed. -Einstein95 (talk) 09:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * As einstein95 tells you, the notice must stand until the discussion has closed. You cannot simply "reject" a submission to articles for deletion. This is not a matter for the talk page, the notice needs to appear on the article so that users can place their votes. Vague | Rant 09:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You have now been blocked for 24 hours for violation of WP:3RR. You must allow the articles for deletion notice to stand until the discussion is concluded. Vague | Rant 09:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -Einstein95 (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring on "Edit warring noticeboard discussion"
Leave it alone. Whether it is true or not, do not remove other editor's reports. When you are deep in a hole it is time to stop digging. Best to you. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Edit warring on the edit warring noticeboard? That's an interesting approach. Viriditas (talk) 20:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Keri (talk) 13:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Keri (talk) 13:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Keri (talk) 13:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ged UK  13:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -Einstein95 (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3357:BA0:5C94:91B2:B204:1F8A (talk) 18:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * A half a year of blocks for edit warring--followed by more edit warring, personal insults in edit summaries, and socking. Drmies (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)