User talk:NatureA16/Archive 2

Palaeos page nominated for deletion
The wikipage on Palaeos (which I didn't write btw, except for the two references at the bottom) is nominated for deletion, please go over there and add your vote! Thanks! M Alan Kazlev 22:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurs e work 09:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Ouachita orogeny
Hi, I noticed you wrote Ouachita orogeny, which was one of the missing articles of WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Hot/O. Just letting you know that there's also Ouachita Geosyncline (or Ouachita geosyncline), apparently "a linear trough in the Earth's crust in which rocks of the Paleozoic Era (from 225000000 to 570000000 years ago) were deposited". Just in case you desperately look for a topic to write about next ;-) --Magnus Manske 22:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Cetaceans
-- Gray  Porpoise Your wish is my command! 20:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I am still working on that article
Hi, I am still working on that article. I just came to a save point and saw edit conflict message. Is there something that bothers you about what I have written? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronbo76 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 21 January 2007 Ronbo76
 * Looks like we both chose to work on the article at the same time. I saw an interim save after I got the conflict save message. Now it looks like what I was working on. You want first dibs on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronbo76 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 21 January 2007 Ronbo76
 * Sorry, I never knew. But I am finished editing that article. I just noticed that the article has expanded so I added some info. M&amp;NCenarius 03:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. At first I thought maybe someone had reverted it thinking an idiot vandal was at work. I am doing some work for the CA ranchos project with WP:CAL. It looks like you did a better job with the headers. What are the chances we should both choose to work on the Verdugo Mountains at the same time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronbo76 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 21 January 2007 Ronbo76
 * PS: Have fun editing! :) M&amp;NCenarius 04:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just finished. I lost one of my windows on the geology of the range and will have to look it up again. It was my problem as after I copied what I needed, I closed the window; pasted in the article and then went for the save. Only, I was out at third base by a mile at Chavez Ravine. There are some articles pasted on the article's talkpage (mostly about the ranch stuff I am working on. The last paragraph has rough coordinates. I was going to figure out a geolink wiki tag to tie in the range to Wikimapia. Take a look at the page and see what you think. Happy trails to you. Ronbo76 04:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks fine. Just a month ago, Verdugo mountains article was a stub; thanks again for the expansion. I added some intro from Fpo sandbox. M&amp;NCenarius 04:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Your edit caused me to look at another article Transverse Ranges which I just wikified. Looks like I got 2Fer tonight. What is the Fpo sandbox? :)  Ronbo76 04:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This. A project about Verdugo Mountains. Nobody has edited it for a year now. M&amp;NCenarius 04:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You just reminded me that I had forgotten to link the governor. Now the article looks great with all the links. I am really glad we got it out of stub status. If you get a chance, you should plug in more of the geology, flora, fauna and references. Ronbo76 04:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just plugged in the geology. You plug in the references as sources and the article should be all set (but I still would go with flora and fauna). I like the geo stuff!!! Ronbo76 04:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, and also, I love geology too! M&amp;NCenarius 04:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I lied. I just put in the first source for the geo stuff. The article looks great now! It is almost Start Class. Ronbo76 04:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The article might even reach GA status if a little more information is added. M&amp;NCenarius 04:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You slay me! I was thinking Mid or Top. Anything in the sandbox for Chavez Ravine - I can't believe that article is a couple of paragraphs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronbo76 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 21 January 2007 Ronbo76
 * Verdugo sub-pages, such as Verdugo Peak, needs to be created. :) M&amp;NCenarius 05:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I knew it should have been rated Top!!! Looks like we took an ugly stick and whomped it into shape. Bravo! Get someone else to re-rate it in a week or so from your project. Ronbo76 05:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I hope we can reach the Verdugo Mountains article into an FA status. M&amp;NCenarius 06:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Let me take a stab at that article. Ronbo76 06:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Please revert Shadow Hills, Los Angeles, California if you don't like my changes. I linked some terms. Some of statements need citations like the mistake statement. References and sources would be nice with expansion if available, i.e., what the grassroots group called today. Ronbo76 06:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks fine. :-) M&amp;NCenarius 06:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Shadow Hills
Please see Shadow Hills. Don't know if this is what the article is about. Ronbo76 06:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Community Info - Sunland - Tujunga Ronbo76

Response to Wikipedia:WikiProject Southern California
Sure. Most of my knowledge I can contribute is just from geographical features around where I live, but I'll try helping out wherever I can. For starters, I'll try to upload pictures of all the mountains I've been working on the last few weeks. Cygnus 04:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcome to the Wikiproject Cygnus, have a good, happy editing! M&amp;NCenarius 04:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:SOCAL. If you have any questions about the project, or the Wikipedia in general, feel free to contact me.  Blank Verse  11:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurs e work 16:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Archiving Talk:Polar Bear
Hi, thanks for archiving the page. I wonder, though, if perhaps next time you could post a warning on the talk page about the impending action, then wait a week and just move the page. It'd preserve the edit history of the page. Xiner (talk, email) 21:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Chemical element is now the Core Topics Collaboration
Thanks, Walkerma 15:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurs e work 16:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Rodinia2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rodinia2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 21:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Bird
Apologies for reverting without explanation. The standard taxobox for all bird articles has regnum, phylum, classis, ordo, familia, genus, species. Although editors have added various infra/super etc bits at various times, the consensus has been to keep it lean, and these has been removed. Unless I've missed something, I assume the same applies to bird. I think it's just coincidence that it was me both times -this page must be on a lot of watchlists. jimfbleak 06:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Matter is now the Core Topics COTF
Thanks, Walkerma 05:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Japan FAC
Hi, sorry to trouble you but the FAC was closed prematurely. It has now been re-opened, so if you could vote again at Featured article candidates/Japanthat would help a lot. Thanks, John Smith&#39;s 20:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 19:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Energy is the new Core Topics Collaboration
I note that there has been some editorial disagreement on that page recently, so please be polite and work via consensus. Thanks! Walkerma 04:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 19:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Europe is now the core topics collaboration
Thanks, Walkerma 04:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

List of characters in Syphon Filter (series)
Should it not be more appropiate to create a page with that title for all/most of the minor charaters in the series?--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 11:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, that's a good idea. M&amp;NCenarius 00:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Which characters should we add then? - Please reply on my talk page.--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 12:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for adding that character in, I added some more characters, hope you can help--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 11:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Asia is the new COTF
Thanks, Walkerma 05:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Template:Mars
Hi, I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here but what does the edit do? sbandrews (t) 21:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It links to the template. M&amp;NCenarius 21:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Ediacaran biota review
Hi,

Just a quick note to thank you for taking the time to read through this article, and your kind comments!

Cheers, Verisimilus  T  18:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 05:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

You helped choose carbon dioxide as this week's WP:ACID winner
Spamsara 22:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Stubs
Many of your recent edits have been to move a stub tag from near the end of an article to the end. While this may be recommended, it often has no visual effect whatsoever, and making such minor changes alone is strongly discouraged, largely because of the extra load on the servers. Please consider not editing articles unless you have more substantive changes to make. --Stemonitis 08:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tunguska event in fiction
Tunguska event in fiction, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Tunguska event in fiction satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Tunguska event in fiction and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Tunguska event in fiction during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eyrian 19:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 12:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Arame
Hello M&NCenarius. I have 2 questions : 1.Where can I read about the stub banner placement policy, I thought it belonged on top as that's where I usually see it. 2.In the discussion page, it is classified a start article, how does that relate to the stub banner? Thank you--Tallard 10:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

ACID Atom
The article Atom, which you voted for the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive on September 11, and was removed on September 11, because on one got around to choosing it as the winner, has been renominated and needs votes. Zginder 16:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Core topics collaboration is now personal finance
Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 04:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)