User talk:Natwill78/ASL interpreting/Beebedell Peer Review

I found this review to be very encouraging and indicative that we are on the right track.

I appreciate that they recognise our specificity and attempt to provide our readers with well-rounded information.

I agree and think a sentence or small paragraph as a lead-up to the remainder of the article after the introduction to prime readers could be useful.

We are working on the education side of the article as I type, so we agree with the assertion that that would be useful to have more about. Besides that, I am glad that our work is translating well to readers. We have tried to be clear, informational, unbiased, and well-rounded.

We will be adding references shortly and will work to keep them in the same citation style as well as adding the wiki-generated reference list.

I personally find Wikipedia articles that are broken up into distinct sections to be the most user-friendly, therefore, this is something I insisted our group do and I am glad it is being appreciated.

Thank you for the helpful peer-review.

Natwill78 (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)