User talk:Naufalhilmi2913

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Arema F.C.—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arema F.C.. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Teles « Talk to me ˱ M @ C S ˲» 17:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Iam sorry Iam I only edited Joko Susilo's page because he has played 2 times at his new club in official competitions Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 17:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Arema F.C.. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Joko Susilo (footballer 1996) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Joko Susilo (footballer 1996), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Kevin Armedyah moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kevin Armedyah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Naufalhilmi2913, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Seiya Da Costa Lay, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Seiya Da Costa Lay. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * In addition to the above a histmerge has been requested. Once completed it is likely that the item will be proposed for deletion. The player does not pass WP:SPORTCRIT or WP:GNG. It is also noted that the page has been returned to draft previously so that is not strictly an option. When an item is returned to draft it is not a good idea to try to get around the AFC process by copy and pasting (or any other method). This can be seen as disruptive and is a form of edit warring. As such it can lead to the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Bayu Aji moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bayu Aji, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Redlinks
Please stop adding redlinks to people who are unlikely to pass GNG and hence qualify for an article on wikipedia. Spike &#39;em (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Bayu Aji for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bayu Aji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bayu Aji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Alvaldi (talk) 09:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bayu Aji


A tag has been placed on Bayu Aji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Bayu Aji. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bayu Aji, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. ''This was deleted only a few hours ago with clear consensus. Recreating the exact same article again is unacceptable.'' Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * you may not delete articles that have been created Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 20:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayu Aji, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * why you blocked Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 20:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)



A request has been filed for the title of Bayu Aji (footballer, born 2000) requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our notability guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and may get you blocked from editing. Thank you. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bayu Aji (footballer, born 2000)


A tag has been placed on Bayu Aji (footballer, born 2000) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Bayu Aji. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * you may not delete the article that I made Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 18:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bayu Aji (footballer)


The article Bayu Aji (footballer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Fails GNG and BIO. Source in article and found in BEFORE are database records and mentions. Nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  05:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bayu Aji (footballer)


A tag has been placed on Bayu Aji (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Bayu Aji. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spike &#39;em (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Stop recreating deleted articles
Please stop re-adding articles on Bayu Aji. The article has been deleted after a deletion discussion; you may not restore it, and if you keep trying the page will be deleted again and you will be blocked from editing.

If you think you can correct the reasons given for deletion in the deletion discussion, you are welcome to contribute to the draft at Draft:Bayu Aji. Please follow the instructions in the grey box titled "draft article not currently submitted for review", and submit the draft for review when you think it's ready. A reviewer will either create an article from the draft, or will leave you feedback on what you still need to improve. If you submit the draft without improving it, it will be automatically declined. Do not move the draft yourself or try to copy it to the article namespace - if you do it will be deleted.

Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * you is crazy and you've gone too far I said do not delete the article that I made Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 20:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Draft:Bayu Aji) for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * unblock please you are crazy Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 17:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Repeatedly calling others editors crazy is more likely to get your block extended than get your full privileges back Spike &#39;em (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Iñaki Peña, you may be blocked from editing. — Manti  core  01:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Neto (footballer, born 1989). — Manti  core  12:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You Are Crazy You Is Dog Iam Angry you blocked editing article me Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cesc Fàbregas. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Frank Lampard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Egghead06 (talk) 15:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)


 * please unblocked my account iam sad you blocked my account😭 Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 16:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joko Susilo
Hello, Naufalhilmi2913. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joko Susilo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bayu Aji
Hello, Naufalhilmi2913. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bayu Aji, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)