User talk:Naurozog

Fair use rationale for Image:FOGH logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FOGH logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FOGH plaque.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:FOGH plaque.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FOGH photo1.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:FOGH photo1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FOGH photo2.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:FOGH photo2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Block
The tag on Gorse Hall clearly stated "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself". But you removed it. That is indiscipline and I have blocked you very briefly for it. It is possible that you may have the right to use the material, if so, please read the text of this template as to how to prove your copyright. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Article deleted as a copyright violation
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the article Gorse Hall, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Friends of Gorse Hall
A tag has been placed on Friends of Gorse Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 18:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You've been vandalising the same article over and over again, please stop immediately. JdeJ (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:MOSMAC. It is certainly not "illegal" to call the country by its recognised name, and that's the name Wikipedia recognises at well. And some of your edits weren't even over this issue, just pure vandalism. JdeJ (talk) 17:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

It is NOT its recognized name. Since there is a dispute of the name and it is currently unresolved(See Nimic approach) I still believe that it creates more harm than anything else to call F.Y.R.O.M. as Republic of Macedonia (constitutional name of F.Y.R.O.M.).Furthermore there was NO vandalism in any of my edits. I will read the WP:MOSMAC

see here

US Gongress urges the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) to stop hostile propaganda and find a mutually acceptable solution with Greece on the name issue    (11/23/07)

"101 Members of the House of Representatives express the sense that the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) should stop the utilization of materials that violate provisions of the United Nations-brokered Interim Agreement between the FYROM and Greece regarding "hostile activities or propaganda" and should work with the United Nations and Greece to achieve longstanding United States and United Nations policy goals of finding a mutually-acceptable official name for the FYROM.

The resolution urges FYROM to retract its attempts to falsify history and claim Greece's heritage as its own. Examples mentioned in the resolution include the renaming of the country's main airport to "Alexander the Great", creating maps for school and military textbooks showing a "Greater Macedonia" that reaches well into Greece and Bulgaria and teaching school children that parts of Greece, including the Greek region of Macedonia, are rightfully part of the FYROM.

It is noted that FYROM's proper name is Vardar as shown in the 1931 Constitution of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (see http://www.mjourney.gr/images/fbfiles/images/yug1.jpg, http://www.mjourney.gr/images/fbfiles/images/yug2.jpg, and http://www.mjourney.gr/images/fbfiles/images/yug3.jpg). FYROM happens to be located within the broader geographic region called Macedonia, but its residents originate from Slavic tribes that migrated to the region during the 6th century, 800 years after Alexander the Great lived in ancient Greece. That is why there are no historical ties between ancient Macedonia and the Slavic population currently residing in FYROM other than the rhetoric that has emerged since the break up of Yugoslavia. " http://www.mjourney.com/news/News_from_Greece/e/2175.US_CONGRESS_URGES_FYROM.html

March 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. JdeJ (talk) 08:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FOGH plaque.jpg
Hi Naurozog!

We thank you for uploading Image:FOGH plaque.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)