User talk:NavaDavuluri

Speedy deletion of Qtech
A tag has been placed on Qtech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G2.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.  Into The Fray  T / C  21:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:QTech.png
Thanks for uploading Image:QTech.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Reqall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B 23:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see Wikipedia's guideline for inclusion of corporate articles and products at WP:CORP. For Wikipedia to include it, there would need to be non-trivial reliable sources of information external to the company itself.  Wikipedia is not a forum for advertising and articles need to be written in a neutral way, not giving out phone numbers to buy the product.  If you believe that there are multiple non-trivial sources of information about this company/product, please let me know and I'll restore the article.  -- B  02:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Qtech
A tag has been placed on Qtech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ReQall
A tag has been placed on ReQall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:ReQallscreenshot.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:ReQallscreenshot.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:ReQall.png
A tag has been placed on Image:ReQall.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The problem is, the page Qtech doesn't make sense, because the goal is to have a page on reQall which is a program that was created by Qtech. I didn't see that there is a way to change the name of the topic entirely. So I ended up having two pages with the same content, namely Qtech and ReQall. I would like to keep the ReQall page. Please delete the Qtech page. If there is a problem also with the way reQall page looks, please let me know what could be done to make it work with the guidelines of Wikipedia. Thank you.


 * Hi there, I'd like to see if I can help acclimate you to Wikipedia. You'll notice that there are a number of warnings on this page for problems with the images you've uploaded and the articles you've created.  These warning notices like to policies that will help explain the proper way to handle the tasks you are trying to accomplish.  Please take the time to read those policies.


 * As far as the articles go, they are currently being deleted because they are written in a promotional manner. Articles should be written in an encyclopedic tone and avoid promoting their subject.  Also, you will want to review corporate notability guidelines - this explains the standards that need to be met for a corporation or product to appear on Wikipedia.


 * Please free free to contact me should you have any further questions. Please note that if you continue to simply recreate the articles and images without attempting to resolve the problems you've been warned about, this account will be blocked from editing.  Thank you. Shell babelfish 18:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * A good example of an article written about a software product is AbiWord. You have a good start on the article, but currently it reads a lot like a feature list - instead of listing each feature, you might try background or development information or other encyclopedic content.  You may also want to browse through the manual of style which will give you some excellent information on how Wikipedia articles are generally laid out and written.  Let me know if there's anything more I can do to help. Shell babelfish 19:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

reQall
I really appreciate your help. I have tried writing this article before and some user deleted it, but I didn't receive help from him on what needs to be done. But you have explained it clearly on what needs to be done here.Thanks again

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ReQall.png
Thanks for uploading Image:ReQall.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)