User talk:Navdeepsoni

December 2019
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.   Deli nk (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * You've done the appeal incorrectly/incompletely and so it is not currently considered active and it is unlikely any other administrators will see it. Normally, I would fix that for you but since you explicitly say you are not appealing the block I'l leave it as is. But just to respond to your comments, this edit, in which you replace a reference in an article with a link to a website that matches your username and which is blatantly advertising your services as a wedding photographer, is why you are blocked. It's worth noting that this edit, wherein you replaced a reference with a link to some clickbait type of article wasn't exactly helpful either. If you do wish to appeal this block at some point I'd be perfectly fine with fixing that appeal for you so it works properly and your appeal will be reviewed by a previously uninvolved administrator. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Yes I don't understand wiki contributions that is why I have been flagged. I don't want to unblock myself. Nor I am not asking for any review. All I have requested in a change in username. Change my username to anything random and block me. I don't want to drag into any further conversation and hoping to close this. I hope this withing policy.


 * I've fixed this appeal for you since you now seem to want to talk to another admin. You may want to read WP:GAB though, attacking me and my username is unlikely to convince anyone it's a good idea to unblock you but I'll leave that to them. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Absolutely, I can see you have made personal remark because of certain ethnicity I belong too. I am not arguing on spam but on the kind of BOT language rather than actually and "amicably" addressing the issue. For your reference, you need to check the comment of the first admin or user who rightly flagged me. I have NOT requested for unblock but you are keen making me "request" you to unblock me. I would rather stay away from wiki community as clearly some of the admins are racist and hateful. As suggested by Wiki rules, the real name can lead to harassment as I can see it is evident from this SPAM looking user name/Admin. So I request some considerate Wiki admin to change my username and keep me BLOCKED so that I am not harassed in the future as done be BEEBLEBROX based purely on my username. This Beeblebrox failed to understand and respond to SPAMMY link already on the said page.


 * "I can see you have made personal remark because of certain ethnicity I belong too." I have literally no idea what this is referring to. I don't care (or even know) what ethnicity you are. I care that you were spamming Wikipedia with links to your personal business website. That others may have done the same does not exonerate you, and it certainly doesn't make me a racist. I think I'm more than done engaging with you. Another admin will be along at some point to review this request. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Doesn't matter what you think about yourself. What you wrote is out there! Stop this harassment and move. Assign someone more human who keeps me "BLOCKED" and just change my username so no one racist target me. It is beyond your comprehension to be real. You are better off with talk and continue with your contributions. Thank you!